Tag Archives: The Lost Expedition

11th July 2023

Blue and Pink were really late arriving, and were much amused by the cheers and applause when they came through the door.  Slightly embarrassed, and after a quick explanation, everyone started splitting into groups.  First was the “Feature Game“, the Fantasies & Futures expansion for one of our more popular, heavier games, Tapestry. On the surface, Tapestry has simple mechanisms, but they combine to make a complex game.  Basically, on their turn, players move one step along one of the four Civilisation tracks around the board: Science, Exploration, Military, Technology and carry out the action (or actions associated with it).  Each space requires payment of resources, and the further along the track, the more expensive the spaces become.

Tapestry: Fantasies & Futures
– Image by boardGOATS

If a player cannot afford to pay (or chooses not to), then they instead take income, which gives them more resources.  They also gain points and play a tapestry card, which usually provides a power for the next round.  So, at its heart, Tapestry is an engine building and resource management game:  players carry out actions and get resources so they can get more resources and ultimately, points.  We have played the first two expansions, Plans and Ploys and Arts & Architecture, but this time the “Feature Game” was the Fantasies & Futures expansion, which is the smallest, adding new Fantasy Civilizations, advanced Capital City mats, new Tapestry and Tech cards.

Tapestry: Fantasies & Futures
– Image by boardGOATS

Ivory was joined by Green, Plum and Byzantium.  Along with the Fantasies & Futures expansion, the group decided to add the “Plans” from the Plans and Ploys expansion as a sort of mini expansion, a private goal, where players get their own, special building they can build.  They also left the Tapestry cards and Civilisations in the mix from the first two expansions and really only left out Arts Advancement track from the Arts & Architecture expansion as they thought it would add too much complexity to the game overall.

Tapestry: Plans and Ploys
– Image by boardGOATS

Tapestry is one of those games that sometimes comes in for criticism for being multiplayer solitaire.  Although that’s not true, there is a strong element of players “getting on with their own thing”.  Although they were each very much playing their own game, there was still quite a bit of interaction which definitely gave the game teeth.  Green’s Civilisation (“Spies”), had him perusing over his neighbours positions and cards each income turn.  Luckily for him Ivory’s Civilisation (“Aliens”) gave him four starting space tiles, and one bonus he could choose was the benefit on an unused tile in a neighbours supply which gave a nice healthy early bonus.

Tapestry: Plans and Ploys
– Image by boardGOATS

Plum’s “Islanders” Civilisation was focused on collecting area tiles and placing them on her Civilisation mat.  So she started out prioritising collecting landscape tiles, looking for ones with water on more edges as these would give her more points in the final income phase.  She got a bit lucky right from the start getting two out of three.  From there she went for an expansionists strategy as did Byzantium (with his “Riverfolk” Civilisation), and from there, throughout the game they found themselves trying to conquer each others territories on the central island.

Tapestry
– Image by boardGOATS

Plum started the game with two Tapestry cards, so chose to use the standard one for her first era.  The second was from one of the expansions and “charmed”, so much to Byzantium’s annoyance when he tried to topple Plum’s Tower in the middle of the map, his attempt was thwarted by Plum’s Trap card which also gave her an extra benefit.  When Plum later attempted to Conquer Byzantium’s tile, he was delighted to be able to repay the earlier battle with his own Trap card. That satisfaction didn’t last, however, as Plum proceeded to play her charmed Anti-trap card which not only stopped the trap dead, but also gave her yet another bonus.

Tapestry
– Image by boardGOATS

That bonus was a random Tapestry card from Byzantium’s hand—he had two, and the one she picked just happened to be the one he had been working towards maximising the effect of (moving up each track once and getting the bonus action for free).  Plum felt pretty bad about picking it, but it was too late by then.   So, all round, it was quite a frustrating game for Byzantium, who started the game with a large forty-eight point bonus from his landscape board (“Forest”), and his first conquering dice rolls, time after time, gave him the choice between a resource or seven points—quite a dilemma in the early part of the game.  Initially he took the seven points (the highest that dice could give him), but found he wasn’t getting as many turns as the others, so later switched to taking the resource.

Tapestry: Fantasies & Futures
– Image by boardGOATS

Ivory, meanwhile, managed to make good use of the charmed Tapestry cards, keeping himself well stocked with resources throughout the game.  The rest of the group barely saw any charmed Tapestry cards (aside from Plum’s Trap and Anti-trap cards), but did find the new Civilisations and Landscape boards quite an interesting addition.  As the endgame approached, Green was last man standing, and for his last few turns he was able to grab an extra Civilisation (“Urban Planner”) which was to reward him handsomely.

Tapestry: Arts & Architecture
– Image by boardGOATS

The game which had been a quite sedate affair, started speeding up a little towards the end.  Pretty much everyone did something that if they had thought just a little a bit more would have gained them another point or so—Green put a cube on another player’s map, Plum put a building somewhere where it could have completed a row if she’d considered a little longer.  As the game came to a close, Ivory and Plum counted their remaining income scores to amazingly find themselves both on two-hundred and thirty-five points.

Tapestry: Fantasies & Futures
– Image by boardGOATS

Then Green counted his final points, giving him the lead by a solitary point. That was until he realised that he’d added thirty-six to one hundred and ninety-nine and discovered he was part of a three-way tie with Ivory and Plum!  Nobody was quite sure how they all managed to have an identical score in such a high scoring game.  If the tie-break had been resources remaining, then Green would have won and if it was Tapestry cards remaining, then Plum would have been the victor.  However, a quick check of the rules suggested the tie-break was in favour of the player with the tallest building (which everyone agreed that was a rubbish tie break), and although Ivory narrowly had a taller building that Green, he graciously agreed that everyone should just share victory.

Tapestry: Plans and Ploys
– Image by boardGOATS

While Tapestry was setting up, on the next table Jade was introducing Black, Purple and Pine (who chose to spectate) to Fantastic Factories.  This is a game where players compete against each other trying to build the most efficient set of factories as quickly as possible.  Players have to carefully manage their blueprints, train their workers, and manufacture as many goods as possible in order to achieve industrial dominance.  Each round consists of two phases:  the market phase and the work phase. In the market phase each player in turn order can either gain a blueprint card from the four available in the market or hire a contractor.

Fantastic Factories
– Image by boardGOATS

To hire a contractor players must pay one card (that matches the tool symbol associated with the contractor’s location on the board) and any additional costs listed.  Contractors have various benefits mostly related to gaining extra resources or extra dice workers for the work phase later in the round.  In the work phase, all players perform actions in their play area simultaneously starting by rolling their four coloured dice (and any additional ones gained from contractors).  Players can use their actions to build cards (which cost various resources matching the building type); while players can build as many cards as they wish in a turn, they may one of each type of building.

Fantastic Factories
– Image by boardGOATS

Dice can be used to take actions on a player’s main Headquarter board or on building cards you have constructed.  A player’s Headquarter board allows them to generate metal and energy.  Players can also activate their buildings once per round. If any player has built ten buildings or produced twelve goods that triggers the end of the game and one final round takes place before end game scoring. Players add up the prestige value of their buildings to their produced goods and the winner is the player with the highest total.  The game was a fairly typical learning game, but was quite close.  Both Purple and Black took thirteen points for their buildings, and while Purple was yet to get her engine going, Black took nine points for his goods.

Fantastic Factories
– Image by boardGOATS

Jade, on the other hand, had fewer points for his buildings (nine), but they were functioning more efficiently.  His total of twenty-three was just one point more than Black who took second.  While they were packing up, the group chatted and Jade showed off Vaalbara, another of his acquisitions from UK Games Expo, which he described this as a nice little set collection, and semi-interactive card game.  Then they chatted while they waited for Tapestry to finish.  And waited some more as the clock ticked and it turned out that Tapestry was no-where as near to finishing as everyone had thought…

Tapestry: Arts & Architecture
– Image by boardGOATS

Meanwhile, Teal was introducing Blue, Pink and Lime to a much older game, Condottiere.  This is a sort of trick taking, battle game.  Set in 13th century Italy, where the wealthy city-states had weak armies.  The Condottiere were veteran English soldiers returned from the Crusades who were contracted to fight for individual city-states by an agreement known as a condotta, the most elite fighters were the mercenary leaders known as the Condottiere.  During each round, control of a State is put up for auction, and players bid the number of troops they are willing to lose in order to win the province.  Players bid with cards that represent Mercenaries, Seasons, Scarecrows, and Political Figures, in an effort to try to take control of four adjacent States.

Condottiere
– Image by boardGOATS

Each player starts with a hand of cards, and one player starts the bidding by choosing a State and a starting bid, playing the card or cards from their hand, face up on the table. Other players follow, playing cards each round.  When a player either cannot play another card (or chooses not to), they “stick”, but unlike many other auctions, in which only the highest bidder loses their bid, at the end, everyone loses all the cards they played, whether they finish with the highest value hand or not.  Mercenary cards have values one to six or ten, while the other cards have special powers that take effect when they are played, but it is how the cards work together that is key.

Condottiere
– Image by boardGOATS

For example, the Drums double’s the value of all that player’s Mercenary cards, but this effect can be offset by another player placing a Winter card reduce every Mercenary card played to a value of one, while a Scarecrow can be used to return a card to its owner’s hand, making it available to play later.  There is also the Heroine, which is untouched by either the Drums or Winter, but also cannot be returned by the Scarecrow.  Perhaps the cleverest cards, however, are the Surrender and Bishop cards;  the Surrender ends the battle immediately (with the current leader winning the battle), and the Bishop ends the battle in peace with no-one winning.

Condottiere
– Image by boardGOATS

While there are some clear uses for some cards (the Bishop is only likely to be played by someone who is losing badly, and the Surrender card is usually played when the active player holds the lead), the meta-game is also important.  Although winning is obviously the aim of the game, as battles become head-to-head, players sometimes end up playing with emotion rather than strategy.  Once a battle has been won, the winner chooses the next city-state to be auctioned and starts the bidding.  Unlike other games, however, play continues with the cards they have left until all players but one have run out of cards, and only then do players get more cards (before they start the next battle).

Condottiere
– Image by boardGOATS

Teal explained the game, and that, although he understood the rules, he had no idea how to win.  Indeed, despite having played Condottiere a lot in the weeks since he acquired it at UK Games Expo, he had never won, a situation that was destined not to change this time.  Teal and Lime won a couple of States, giving them extra cards in the refresh.  Blue and Pink realised they were at a disadvantage, so set out to rectify things.  They took a couple of States and redressed the balance.  Then Pink stole a march when he forced Lime to lead out in a battle he could not win.  With this giving him three adjacent states, the writing was on the wall.  Lime, Teal and Blue tried to work together to prevent Pink from taking the last one, but without success.

Condottiere
– Image by boardGOATS

It had been a very enjoyable game, and given its success, the group went on to play another of Teal’s UK Games Expo acquisitions—Burgle Bros..  This is a cooperative game, a style the group traditionally eschew, though recently have played more often (including Scotland Yard last year, The Lost Expedition about six months ago, Zoo Break twice in quick succession, and Forbidden Dessert a couple of weeks ago).  Burgle Bros. works in a similar way to the other games of this type.  Players are a team of robbers, attempting to enter a building from the ground floor, raiding the safes on each floor before escaping by helicopter from the roof.  In addition to finding and cracking the safes, players also have to avoid the Security Guards that patrol the building.

Burgle Bros.
– Image by boardGOATS

In the game, players each have three Stealth tokens. Whenever they are on the same tile with a Guard, they lose one and if any player is caught without a stealth token, the game is over.  On their turn, players have four actions (move, preparing a safe for cracking by putting some dice on its tile, rolling dice to attempt to crack the code etc.).  Once the player has taken their turn, the Guard takes their turn, moving towards their target room (assigned by the route deck and marked with an orange die).  So to win, players first have to find the safe and then crack the code and all without triggering the motion detectors, heat sensors, fingerprint scanners, laser fields, open walkways, deadbolt rooms, and of course avoiding the guards…

Burgle Bros.
– Image by boardGOATS

The group decided to play on the beginner’s level which meant they only had two floors to explore before they could escape the building.  They got lucky right at the start as they popped up from the ground floor right next to the safe. That meant they only had to reveal all the orthogonal tiles and then roll dice to match the code. They were luckier still as the security guard was on the other side of the building and there were very few walls obstructing their way.  As a general rule, cooperative games of this type give each player unique special powers and using these effectively is usually critical to success.

Burgle Bros.
– Image by boardGOATS

So, Pink (who was “The Hacker” and didn’t trigger alarms) was sent off to reveal tiles while Blue (“The Spotter”) started setting up the safe for Lime, who was “The Peterman” and got to roll an additional die when trying to crack the safe.  Before long, things on the first floor looked pretty much under control with just the last few numbers left to crack the safe, so Teal (“The Juicer”) took himself off to the second floor to start hunting for the safe there.  This was a risky strategy as it triggered the Guard moving on the second floor.  However, with fewer people on both floors, the Guards effectively moved slower and gave players more chance to avoid them.

Burgle Bros.
– Image by boardGOATS

Things were slightly more challenging on the second floor—the Security Guard was a little more proactive, stepping it out more and, of course, the group didn’t find the safe at the top of the stairs this time.  It didn’t take him long to find it though, and with nothing better to do, Pink joined Teal on the second floor, ducking under the risky laser trap at the top of the stairs.  Meanwhile, Lime had finally managed to crack the safe, so Blue headed up the stairs only to find the second floor security guard heading her way, so she escaped to the roof toting their loot (a very annoying large and heavy bust and a particularly yappy dog) .

Burgle Bros.
– Image by boardGOATS

There was a bit of shenanigans as Lime joined Teal and Pink and also dodged the Security Guard (and lost a couple of Stealth tokens), but although there were a couple of near misses, it wasn’t long before all four were on the roof awaiting their lift to safety.  It was another fun game, but with time marching, Lime and Teal headed for home, leaving Blue and Pink to join Jade, Purple and Black who were still waiting for Tapestry to finish.  It was nice to chat though, and eventually Tapestry did finish and everyone who needed one got their lift home (without having to climb on to the roof…).

Burgle Bros.
– Image by boardGOATS

Learning Outcome:  New games are fun, but there are lots of good, slightly older games to be had as well at places like Expo.

7th February 2023

Blue, Jade, Plum and Byzantium were first to arrive and started by ordering food and then settled down for a chat.  Pine soon joined them, followed by Teal, Green, Black, Purple and Ivory.  With Lime tucked up in bed fending off his lurgy, and Lilac away for work, it was just Pink who was trapped on the motorway system somewhere between The Jockey and the Frozen North.  So, while food was being finished the others wanted a short game for the other end of the table.  Teal had brought along The Lost Expedition and Cottage Garden. Both were apparently at least thirty minutes which probably meant nearly an hour, so we settled on a short one everyone knew, NMBR 9.

NMBR 9
– Image by boardGOATS

This is a super-quick little game, but what really makes it special is that it has almost zero set-up time.  The idea is that one player turns over cards, and these indicate which of ten tiles should be played on that turn.  Players take the tiles straight from the box and add them to their tableau with players making sure edges touch and when placing tiles on higher layers, there must be no overhangs and tiles must cover at least two other tiles.  Players score for the number on each tile multiplied by the “story” or “floor” (thus a nine placed on the third layer (second floor) scores eighteen points).  The player with the largest total is the winner.

NMBR 9
– Image by boardGOATS

Everything started reasonably well with some low numbers to start, including the zero, to help players build a base. The first nine came out in time for most people to have built a base to place it on, but it was after this that  it all started to go wrong.  Everyone seemed to struggle to fit the numbers coming out anywhere higher than the bottom layer, and even then players discovered they had blocked themselves from the best base places.  Players were were struggling to get much on their second layer, let alone the third, so by the time the last two numbers were drawn (six and one), most people had barely managed a third layer.

NMBR 9
– Image by boardGOATS

The one came out and was generally placed on top for a whopping three points for most and then the six could only go on the second layer.  Everyone felt they just hadn’t managed things very that well this time—all except Black that is.  He had been quietly getting on with things in the corner, building his third layer and a final fourth layer for his last number.  The end result was that Black ended up with a score that was one of the group’s highest ever for this game and nearly twice that of second place Teal with Green not too far behind in third.  With that done, it was time to decide who would play what.

NMBR 9
– Image by boardGOATS

Most people seemed to want to give the “Feature Game“, Flamecraft a go.  That was OK, as we had two copies of that available, but the question was what the third game might be.  Green failed to find any takers for Terraforming Mars, so in the end Pine and Teal joined him giving the Pennsylvania map for Ticket to Ride a go.  The Pennsylvania map is part of Map Collection Volume 5 and is the reverse side to the United Kingdom board. All the Ticket to Ride games are built round the same basic idea:  on their turn, players either take carriage cards from the market or use carriage cards to pay to place trains on the map connecting cities together.  Players score points for placing pieces on the map and for completing tickets (connecting two places on the board).

Ticket to Ride Map Collection: Volume 5 – United Kingdom & Pennsylvania
– Image by boardGOATS

Each map has special rules and or mechanisms that are unique to it.  In the case of the Pennsylvania map, this is the ability to acquire Shares.  Each time a player completes a route, they claim a Share token for one of the companies depicted next to that route. At the end of the game, whoever holds the most Shares in each company receives points.  The trio entered into the game without much thought of how it might be best played, so started out doing their best to complete tickets, with the Shares just an added bonus.  Pine was the first to place a train, from Johnstown to Altoona, while Green and Teal continued to collect cards.  Teal was second to place trains, a long route on the eastern side from New York to Philadelphia and Green was a little later in the north west.

Ticket to Ride Map Collection: Volume 5 – United Kingdom & Pennsylvania
– Image by boardGOATS

There wasn’t much else going on except card collecting, and there didn’t seem to be any Locomotive cards in the deck.  When Pine extended his single train westwards to Pittsburg, there was a groan from Green—he had just been unable to get the colours he needed for the same track and now had to go the long way round.  Adding to Green’s woes, Teal then took the three train route in from Towanda to Scranton, that he’d wanted for his two point ticket.  Annoyingly, it didn’t have a specified colour, so he could have placed something there almost any time, but had been concentrating on getting the colours for the routes into Johnstown for his bigger value ticket.

Ticket to Ride Map Collection: Volume 5 – United Kingdom & Pennsylvania
– Image by boardGOATS

When Pine then claimed the final entry into Johnstown to completely block Green out, he was convinced his game was over, with two failed tickets before it was even half way.  With a handful of train cards and no-where else to go, Green was the first to take new tickets, keeping just one.  After placing trains along the northern edge of the state and into Canada, Green had another go at taking tickets, this time keeping two.  With there being a big fifteen point bonus for the most completed tickets and no bonus for longest continuous string of train pieces, this version of Ticket to Ride encouraged everyone to place trains on almost any route.

Ticket to Ride Map Collection: Volume 5 – United Kingdom & Pennsylvania
– Image by boardGOATS

And this was without the Shares—everyone had been been quietly collecting them. Pine seemed to be going for a lot of the highest value, the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, although that was mostly because he kept forgetting he had them.  Teal was collecting a variety, but was the first to take Shares in a lot of the lower value companies (which had fewer Shares available). In fact he was so entranced with the share collecting, he was placing his trains on routes to collect shares and forgetting about his ticket completion, which was to be his downfall.

Ticket to Ride Map Collection: Volume 5 – United Kingdom & Pennsylvania
– Image by boardGOATS

Pine brought the game to a close with just two trains left leaving Green and Teal to place one more two train route each, though Pine was unable to place any more trains for one last Share.  Not terribly surprisingly, Pine eschewed Teal’s suggestion of taking tickets.  He’d taken some earlier and although in this game players get four tickets and only need to keep one, he still felt they looked awfully difficult to do.  Plus with trains all over the board, it seemed very unlikely that a route may have already been completed, much more so than in some of the other versions of the game where it sometimes feels like it is worth a shot.

Ticket to Ride Map Collection: Volume 5 – United Kingdom & Pennsylvania
– Image by boardGOATS

The final scoring was to prove interesting: scores for just placing train pieces on the board were all relatively close.   Everyone had to get their fingers and toes out to score the Shares, but in the end found the scores were all very close on these as well, even though everyone had had different approaches towards them.  It was the tickets that were to be the deciding factor.  As mentioned, Teal had largely forgotten about his routes, and although he had managed two of them, the last was incomplete and counted against him, giving him a ticket score in single digits.  Pine had completed four tickets with most of them being good scorers. Green had also managed to complete four tickets, but this score was off-set by his two failures from the early part of the game.

Ticket to Ride Map Collection: Volume 5 – United Kingdom & Pennsylvania
– Image by boardGOATS

The tie for the most ticket bonus was “friendly” so they both scored it, but those failed tickets cost Green a total of around forty points, roughly Pine’s winning margin.  As the group packed away, they discussed the Pennsylvania map and agreed it was quite good.  Although the Shares score was fairly even, the fact that the bonus was for tickets and not the longest continuous set of trains, meant everyone tended to build all over the board rather than focusing on a connected set.  The feeling was that playing again people might well go for even more of the short routes to gain more Shares, rather than the long high scoring routes—food for thought from a very worthy Ticket to Ride expansion.

Ticket to Ride Map Collection: Volume 5 – United Kingdom & Pennsylvania
– Image by boardGOATS

By this time it was nearly 10pm, but Teal wanted to try out the cooperative game, The Lost Expedition.  The box suggested thirty to fifty minutes, but Teal assured the group that it was unlikely to take that long and everyone would probably die fairly quickly.  He had played it solo a few times and always died, so was keen to try it with a team.  The idea of the game is that they take the role of a team of three in search of the lost legendary explorer, Percy Fawcett.  The game has really nice artwork a little reminiscent of Tin Tin style and large, easy to read cards.  Teal explained the rules, but it wasn’t until play started that Green and Pine really understood how it worked and it wasn’t really that difficult.

The Lost Expedition
– Image by boardGOATS

Each player started with a hand of four cards and took it in turns to lay one forming a route, with the numbered cards increasing in value.  This was creating a path for the explorers to travel, with some loses and some benefits, and several cards which also allowed them to skip or swap other cards on the track.  This meant that if there was a particularly bad card the players could try and place it after one that allowed following cards to be skipped, and therefore not have to deal with it at all.  In the first “Morning” round, the group each played two cards from their hand.  Once that was done, they then started down the path, deciding what to do with each one.

The Lost Expedition
– Image by boardGOATS

There were usually several choices:  some had compulsory things to do, others were optional.  For example, for the Panther card the group had to decide on whether to use one of the three bullets the team start the expedition with (leading Pine to comment on how stupid it was to enter a several day jungle adventure with only three bullets!) in order to gain three food, or to lose a health token to skip over the card.   Once the first path was completed, the group progressed onto the next part, the “evening”, building a path from the remaining cards in the order of placement (the face value on the card was irrelevant now).

The Lost Expedition
– Image by boardGOATS

Fortunately, the group had a couple of skips and swaps (allowing them to switch the position of two cards on the path), and by the end they had taken several steps on the main route through the jungle towards their goal.  The group had taken a few health hits along with the way, but their three characters still seemed to have at least two or three of their initial four health points remaining.  The next day everyone again started with four cards and by the end of the morning phase the team were only two steps from the goal, but their health was beginning to look a little poor.  With the evening placements the group somehow managed to make those final two steps with the first two cards of the path before anything bad happened.

The Lost Expedition
– Image by boardGOATS

The team had beaten the game, however, it was with the easy setting which has only seven spaces on the main route through the jungle—the standard game has nine!  Nevertheless, Teal was pleased to have finally beaten the game and Green and Pine had enjoyed it too.  It is a  clever little co-operative game that really encourages discussion and doesn’t let one player dominate.  With the hand of cards it also provided an element of individual game play and decision making, further preventing the “alpha gamer” problem that often blights cooperative games.  As a result, this game might well appeal to those who do not normally enjoy them and this one could well get another outing.

The Lost Expedition
– Image by boardGOATS

Meanwhile, the other two tables were playing the “Feature Game“, Flamecraft.  This is a game where players take the role of Flamekeepers, gathering items, placing dragons and casting enchantments to enhance the Shops of the town with the aim of finishing the game with the most Reputation points.  A sort of worker-placement game, players take it in turns to firstly move their dragon to one of the Shops and then either Gather resources from it and optionally play a dragon into the Shop, or spend resources to Enchant or upgrade it so it provides more resources.  This sounds very simple and not terribly exciting, but the interplay between the actions on the dragon cards and the large pile of available Shops is what makes the game interesting.

Flamecraft
– Image by boardGOATS

When a player Gathers resources they can also activate or “Flame” one dragon and the special ability for the Shop (if it has one).  In contrast, a player that Enchants a Shop, they can activate all the dragons in the Shop, but cannot activate any special ability associate with the store.  There are six different types of Artisan Dragon and, although every card has a unique name and artwork, the actions are the same for any one type.  For example, all Diamond Dragons allow the active player to take three gems from the supply, and all Bread Dragons allow them to take another Artisan Dragon card from the market or face down deck.

Flamecraft
– Image by boardGOATS

Players get Reputation points for Enchanting Shops:  they pay resources to buy one of the face up cards from the Enchantment market and add it to the Shop they are at which must match the Resource type. There are other ways of getting Reputation though.  For example activating a Plant dragon allows a player to gift another person any resource and in return get two Reputation points.  Some of the Shops also give Reputation points, but perhaps one of the best source is through Fancy Dragons.  These are special dragons which are effectively Goal cards.

Flamecraft
– Image by boardGOATS

Players start the game with two Fancy dragons and choose one to keep and add to their hand.  These come in two types—day and night.  Daytime Fancy dragons (marked with a sun) can be completed at any point during the player’s turn and give points in exchange for Resources or manipulating the game so certain conditions are met.  In contrast, nighttime Fancy dragons are evaluated at the end of the game giving points, for example, for being the player with the most of one Resource or for each Resource of which you have an odd number.

Flamecraft
– Image by boardGOATS

Both groups began with the slightly simpler, purple enchantment deck and without the special helper cards (which are an optional addition to the game that provide a one-time special ability to each player).  Just as Byzantium, Ivory and Blue were about to start, Pink rocked up and joined the game so after the set up had been adjusted and the rules were explained they got going.  Blue started by collecting Resources.  On the first play, Flamecraft has a tendency to feel a little bit aimless, but as soon as the special (non-start) Shops started to come out, things get a little more interesting.  Although there are only six different types of Artisan dragons, the interplay between them and the Shop powers is much more interesting than it seems at first glance.

Flamecraft
– Image by boardGOATS

Ivory was quick to get a feel for things and soon scored some points, as was Byzantium, who was the only one around the first table that had played it before.  Pink and Blue were a little slower to get off the ground, but soon started to improve their Reputation as well.  There was a bit of a rules glitch towards the end when they realised they had forgotten to put out at least one new Shop, but otherwise play proceeded very smoothly to the end of the game.  None of the Shops with the wild icon came out, but there was an awful lot of iron available from early in the game.

Flamecraft
– Image by boardGOATS

There was also a bit of a general shortage of Bread dragons, which is significant as activating them allows players to take another Artisan dragon card, and the few that were played were moved all over the board by people playing Potion dragons. It was a close game though with lots of to-ing and fro-ing, but when Blue had the chance, she triggered the end of the game by taking the last of the Artisan dragons, giving everyone one last turn which they tried to use to their best advantage.  Blue just got her nose in front with Ivory a point behind, but there were still nighttime Fancy dragons to add on and points from dragongeld too.

Flamecraft
– Image by boardGOATS

Unfortunately for Ivory, his extras exactly matched Blue’s so her single point lead remained, with Byzantium taking third.  The second Flamecraft group were slightly slower to get started and were still very much underway with both the Ticket to Ride/Lost Expedition and first Flamecraft groups finished.  Pine, Teal and Ivory headed home, so while the second Flamecraft group finished and Byzantium watched, Pink, Green and Blue played a quick game of the filler, No Thanks!.  This is one of our old favourites and is very simple with players either taking the face up card on their turn or paying a chip to pass the problem on to the next player.

No Thanks!
– Image by boardGOATS

The player with the lowest face up total wins, so eyebrows were raised when Green started collecting cards in the thirties.  If players get a run, only the lowest of the set count to their final score, but since nine of the thirty-four cards have been removed from the deck it is dangerous to bank on building long runs.  Pink picked up the four as almost the first card of the game, and managed to build quite a long run over the course of the game.  All was going well until he ran out of chips and was forced to take cards he didn’t want.  This also screwed up Green’s plans as he wasn’t able to make the most of his high value cards and force Pink and Blue to give him chips.

No Thanks!
– Image by boardGOATS

Worse, Pink took a couple of cards Green really wanted.  Blue, who started collecting cards in the high teens extended her run into the low twenties.  The final card she needed, the seventeen was the final card in the deck and she snaffled it at her first chance to end the game and give her a run from fifteen to twenty-one.  After a couple of recounts, Pink and Green finished in a tie with a massive sixty-nine points, more than twice Blue’s winning score.

No Thanks!
– Image by boardGOATS

The second game of Flamecraft was just coming to an end, but unfortunately, they had a slight rules malfunction and were playing that emptying either the Fancy dragon or Enchantment deck triggered the endgame, when it is the Artisan dragon or Enchantment deck according to the rules as written.  Usually, it is Blue that makes these sort of rules errors, so despite having read the rules at least three times in the last few hours, she panicked and checked them yet again, just in case.  The second group had a shortage of Bread dragons as well, though for a slightly different reason.

Flamecraft
– Image by boardGOATS

The selection of Artisan dragons in the face up market was almost entirely “Toast” for most of the game—Black shuffled so they blamed him.  This meant players spent most of the game taking Artisan dragons blind from the top of the face down draw deck.  As a result, players  didn’t have Bread dragons in hand, so only a couple of Bread dragons were placed in Shops and they just got pulled from pillar to post for the whole game.  The Shop shuffling was slightly better though and there were some that came out that were new Plum and Jade (who had both played before), which was nice.  The game was also close, with Jade taking victory by a single point from Plum with Purple taking third a few points behind.

Flamecraft
– Image by boardGOATS

Learning outcome:  Even dragons like a nice sandwich.