Tag Archives: Coloretto

10th December 2024

Everyone had already arrived and was waiting in anticipation when Blue and Pink arrived with piles of gamers crackers, Christmas tree decorations, party poppers, paper parcels, mince pies, festive cakes (with carrot meeples on top) and GOAT Award voting forms.  Food quickly followed along with a volley of noise as people tried to pull their crackers and party poppers first so the contents didn’t land in their supper.  As people munched, there was some discussion about the games played and voting forms were filled in.  In the absence of Green, Pine kindly offered to act as returning officer and collate the statistics.

"Un-Christmas Party" 2024
– Image by boardGOATS

While cake and mince meat parcels were shared round, toasts were offered by Lime to the organisers, and in the memory of Burgundy.  He is much missed and will never be forgotten, but we always make a special point of remembering at this time of year, especially as the Un-Christmas Dinner was his last games night with us.  The GOAT Awards were then announced.  Moment of the Year was when Pine got the end game rule wrong for Tonga Bonga, so that Pink thought he’d won, but then didn’t.  The GOAT Poo Prize for the least popular game of the year went to Ca$h ‘n Guns—not a game the group plays often and its only outing over the last year was at the New Year Party.

"Un-Christmas Party" 2024
– Image by boardGOATS

Then it was time for the Golden GOAT.  Previous winners were ruled out, but other contenders included Akropolis, Kavango, Flamme Rouge and Ticket to Ride: Rails & Sails.  The clear winner of the 2024 Golden GOAT Award, however, was Stamp Swap.  There was much discussion about how this was the third winner from Stonemaier Games (after Tapestry last year and Wingspan in 2019) and how we should invite Jamey Stegmaier, to collect the award in person.  Email correspondence over the following few days suggested that while it was unlikely he would be able to come to GOATS, he will be in the UK next year and just might make it as far as Oxford.  In the meantime, he has highlighted the award on his website.

Golden GOAT - 2024
– Image by boardGOATS

With the festive business over, the group broke into three to play some games.  Pink, Blue, Black and Jade began with the “Feature Game“, Courses De Rennes (aka Reindeer Races), a fun little game where players control a team of four reindeer, racing along four different tracks to try to get the highest-scoring tiles.  On their turn, each player can either draw two cards (with a hand limit of seven) or play as many cards of the same type as they can to move one reindeer along one of the tracks.  The cards are numbered and have suit that corresponds to one of the tracks (or are Elfy, and “wild”).  If two and a three of Gifts is played, the player may move one of its reindeer along the Gift track.

Course des Rennes
– Image by boardGOATS

If a reindeer lands on the same space as another reindeer, it slides forward a space.  If that is occupied too, it continues to slide.  If, however, the owner cries “Thump!” as it lands, the reindeer slithers an extra space forward.  The first reindeer to arrive at the end of a track claims the highest value token.  The game ends when two of the tracks have run out of tokens.  Pink too the first points, and with it a strong early lead.  A few rounds later, Jade took the last token from one of the tracks and with it ended the game.  He got very unimpressed looks from Black and Blue as he gifted victory to Pink, so once this was pointed out, Jade revised his move and play carried on.

Course des Rennes
– Image by boardGOATS

Ultimately, however, it didn’t really change things as Pink still took victory with twenty-two points.  He was long way clear of Jade who won the tight fight for second with fifteen just one point ahead of Black who, in turn, took third by a single point.  Everyone else was still playing, so the group looked for something else to play.  Black had won a copy of Ticket to Ride: Paris in the raffle and, although it wasn’t very festive, it seemed appropriate to give it an outing.  Some of the GOATS had played this mini-city variant of the popular train game earlier in the year when we marked the Olympics with sport and France themed games.  However, none of the current quartet had been part of that group.

Ticket To Ride: Paris
– Image by boardGOATS

The rules are much the same as all the others (take two cards from the market; play cards to place pieces on the map; collect Ticket cards to score points at the end), but like all the variants, Paris has a special rule.  When players claim a red, white, or blue track, they get a card, when they get all three colours they get four “Tricolore” bonus points.  When the game first came out, there had been comments about how this felt very bolted on, but in practice, it was much more interesting than it sounded.  This time, the in game scoring was quite tight, though Blue, with her trains across the city centre got her nose in front and led by six points.  Tickets can make a huge difference to scores though, as they can give a lot of points, both positive and negative.

Ticket To Ride: Paris
– Image by boardGOATS

Black, Pink and Jade all picked up similar points for their completed Tickets (ten, eleven and eight respectively), though Jade was unlucky and unable to complete his last one.  Blue, however, made good use of concurrent routes and scored a massive twenty-four points for hers giving her something of a landslide victory with a total of forty-six.  It was much closer for second which went to Pink who finished with twenty-nine, two points ahead of Black.  Meanwhile, on the other side of the room, Purple was leading Ivory, Plum and Byzantium in one of her favourite Christmas themed games, Christmas Tree.

Christmas Tree
– Image by boardGOATS

This is a fairly simple little card-drafting game played over thee rounds, where players are “decorating their Christmas Tree” with diamond-shaped cards, where players score points for the Objective cards everyone contributed to a central pool at the start of the round.  This time, the group played from the advanced set of Objective cards (including all three levels) although the first round, the cards were all levels one and two.  These gave one point for each blue or “nobbly” ornament, four points for each pair of ornaments of the same colour and shape arranged in a vertical pair and six points for three specific shapes in a given arrangement.

Christmas Tree
– Image by boardGOATS

The first round started off slowly with everyone looking to fulfill some of the Objectives—everyone was successful, but Plum and Byzantium got off to a better start.  Plum placed her first Gingerbread man and then concentrated on placing vertical pairs although she only managed that once.  In the second round the Objectives were from the more complicated sets, including six points for three specific colours in a given arrangement, six points for the same three shapes or colours in a set pattern, or eight points for four ornaments with the same point value arranged in two set formations.  This time, Byzantium significantly out scored everyone with multiple objectives scored multiple times and, as a result, built a big lead.

Christmas Tree
– Image by boardGOATS

Plum used one of her Biscuits to move baubles around to make a row of four contain the three colours of glass bauble.and thus scored well, whereas Ivory was focusing on picking up high value Sweets and surrounding his Gingerbread men.  The final set of Objectives included six points for a set arrangement of certain point values, eight points for four ornaments with the same point value arranged in a particular arrangement and five points for each row in which the total points of the glass were above the given amount. Finally, there were two points for each Gingerbread man, with bonuses of six and three points for the player with the most/second most Gingerbread men.

Christmas Tree
– Image by boardGOATS

In the third and final round, Byzantium again out scored everyone, scoring multiple times for the set arrangement of certain point values.  At this point, Ivory was full committed to Sweets and Gingerbread men, especially knowing he was putting in the Gingerbread man Objective, which he scored well for.  Plum and Purple also scored well in the final round, with Plum following a strategy similar to Byzantium, whereas was Purple was collecting sweets like Ivory.  It looked like Byzantium was going to win by a large amount, as he was fifty points ahead of everyone else and was scoring more than anyone else for Lights and Baubles too.

Christmas Tree
– Image by boardGOATS

Ivory’s focus on surrounding his Gingerbread men gave him over fifty points and with more than thirty for his sweets he finished with one hundred and seventy one points, pipping Byzantium to victory by just two, with Plume in third some twenty points adrift.  The puzzly nature of the the game had gone down well and with the Christmas theme everyone had enjoyed playing Christmas Tree.  On the next table, the festive link was much more tenuous, however.  Teal, Pine, Sapphire and Indigo had chosen 6 Nimmt!, because there was a twelve in it, representing the Twelve Days of Christmas (or perhaps they had just wanted to play the game and if you can’t play a daft party game at Christmas, when can you?).

6 Nimmt!
– Image by boardGOATS

6 Nimmt! is a popular game with the group at any time of year, though it is usually played with more than four people.  Either way, the game is very simple to play, though tough to play well.  Some say this is because there is a lot of chance in the game, but they are usually the people who do badly…  The idea is that players simultaneously choose a card to play and these are then added, in order, to the rows of cards on the table.  The player adding the sixth card, instead, takes the first five cards into their scoring pile.  Usually, we deal out half the cards for the first round and the rest for the second and the winner is the player with the fewest “nimmts” (or points), at the end of the two rounds.

6 Nimmt!
– Image by boardGOATS

This time, however, the group decided to play the multiple-hand variant where each hand has ten cards, and the game ends when someone’s score passes sixty-six.  And that was Sapphire, who finished with an exceptional total of ninety-five.  The winner was Teal with forty-four, however, who was just two points better off than Pine.  The other games were still ongoing, but there was still time for one last game for this group (who were joined by Navy) before everyone went home warmed by the Christmas Gaming Spirit—and their choice of game was Coloretto (apparently this is a  festive game because it includes red, green and gold Chameleons).

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

This is another simple filler game, where players either take a card and add it to a truck, or take a truck.  Each truck can take a maximum of three Chameleons, with players collecting coloured sets.  The largest three sets score positive points (according to the Triangular Number Series), while all the others score negative points.  In this way, the bigger the series the more additional cards will score, so the aim is to collect three large sets and ensure the others are as small as possible.  This game was really tight, with Sapphire claiming victory with twenty-seven and Teal and Indigo tying for second on twenty-four.  And with that, people began to drift off, many not to be seen until 2025.

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

Learning outcome:  GOATS love a Cracker!

12th Movember 2024

The evening began with Plum explaining the “Feature Game” to Indigo and Navy, despite the fact they had already decided they were unlikely to play it.  Still, there was time to fill as people finished eating and the stragglers, and that was as good a way as any.  The game in question was Underwater Cities, which is a sort of worker-placement and network-building game.  Although the game is quite complex, the underlying mechanism is quite simple:  players start their turn with a hand of three Cards and, on their turn choose an Action space and pay a Card to use it.  The Action spaces and the Cards come in three different colours, green, red and orange.

Underwater Cities
– Image by boardGOATS

If the colour of the Card played matches the colour of the Action space chosen, then the player gets to activate the Card, most of which have an instant effect (though for some, the effect is delayed).  In general, the orange Action spaces are quite powerful and the green Action spaces are weak, whereas the green Cards have powerful effects and the orange cards are weaker, thus the Cards and Actions together are balanced.  Each Action space can only be activated by one person per round and the game takes place over ten rounds (though the group used the Quick Start variant from the New Discoveries expansion which replaces the first round) with each player taking three actions per round and production phases after the fourth, seventh and final rounds.

Underwater Cities
– Image by boardGOATS

The aim of the game is to build a network on players’ personal player board, connecting Cities together with Tunnels and adding and Upgrading Buildings to provide production capabilities.  There are four Resources, Kelp, Steelplast, Science and Biomatter together with money, or Credits; these are produced by Farms (Kelp), Desalination plants (money) and Laboratories (Steelplast and Science).  Biomatter is essential for building symbiotic cities and can also be a universal building material (can be used instead of Kelp or Steelplast), but is a rare Resource that can only be acquired through Cards, Actions and by connecting some Metropolises to a player’s network.

Underwater Cities
– Image by boardGOATS

Players score points during the game and in the production phases after the fourth and seventh rounds, but most of the points are scored at the end of the game after the final production phase.  At this point, players score for the number of different Buildings next to each connected city in their network, for any end-game scoring cards, for their final scoring Metropolis and for any Resources they have left.  Indigo and Navy showed some appreciation as Plum explained, but ultimately decided it wasn’t for them, and were replaced by Cobalt and Ivory, both of whom had an idea of how the game played from watching run-through videos.

Underwater Cities
– Image by boardGOATS

The Quick Start gave everyone an Enhanced Assistant so Plum started with the ability to get Biomatter on production, so she was able to build purple Symbiotic Cities (which score more points) right from the beginning.  Cobalt’s also helped him when building Cities, giving him one Credit or Steelplast discount, although he didn’t really take advantage of this until the final Era. In contrast, Ivory focused on the end-game scoring from his Metropolis which required him to build seven Cities to get the maximum number of points.  By the first production phase, he had already built three and connected them to his network with Tunnels, but all those people needed a lot of feeding which was costly and slowed him down a lot.

Underwater Cities
– Image by boardGOATS

Plum focused on building a robust food engine with two upgraded green Buildings attached to one City (her end-game Metropolis also gave points for sets of upgraded structures) while Cobalt focused on getting his engine online and started on his objective to connect all his Metropolises and Cities with Tunnels in the second and third Eras.  He was aided by an ongoing ability that triggered whenever he used an Assistant (draw a Card and gain a Point), which he used heavily, getting four Assistants early in the game and activating them all in every Era. The extra Card draw ensured he was always able to play a matching coloured card with every Action which also helped.

Underwater Cities
– Image by boardGOATS

Plum pointed out that a friend who she plays with and often wins says, “Don’t always let me get the Special Cards—they are powerful!”  So after the first production phase, there was a focus on the special cards in middle, all of us grabbing some quite powerful abilities.  Ivory got an additional tile that gave him points every production phase and Plum got a heavily discounted City.  Cobalt’s engine was working very effectively by this time giving him lots of Resources and discounted Actions.  Despite her Special Cards, Plum was struggling as the main upgrade slot which she needed for her end-game Metropolis was denied to me when she had the Resources to use it.  Instead she ended up focusing on Symbiotic Cities and ended up with only the one regular City.

Underwater Cities
– Image by boardGOATS

After the second production phase, there was a big focus on how to maximize points. Ivory took a risk, taking the end game scoring card that gave twelve points for the player with the most upgraded Tunnels.  When he took it, he had the most upgraded Tunnels, but it was clear that Cobalt could challenge this.  Cobalt on the other hand had grabbed a couple of Special Cards giving three points per upgraded Tunnel plus one point per Card in his tableau.  For Ivory to score his Card it was critical that he denied Cobalt the ability to upgrade in the last turn and Ivory was able to make sure he took his first in the final round—this was fairly ironic as the majority of the rounds he had been the last player!

Underwater Cities
– Image by boardGOATS

This scuppered Cobalt’s plans and gave a twenty-four point swing in Ivory’s favour, but since he had increased his hand limit to four and was drawing multiple cards, he was able to pivot and build a City sharing two upgraded Farms and us Cards that provided points when played. This also produced quite a few resources in the final production phase.  Plum was struggling towards the end of the game as she couldn’t get the final Resources she needed to build the last two Tunnels to connect her end-game scoring Metropolis.  Despite it failing to score, it had still been a good focus for her game as the upgraded structures had given her extra production during the game and those Metropolis points would only be critical if the game was close.

Underwater Cities
– Image by boardGOATS

And close it was.  Plum had a slight lead going into the end game scoring and and-game scoring cards gave points fairly evenly too.  Cobalt and Ivory had the same number of Cities with three different Buildings, slightly more than Plum, but she more than made up for it with her Cities with her Cities with two different Buildings.  The Metropolis she failed to connect proved critical in her scoring though and although she just edged Ivory by two points, Cobalt ultimately took victory, also by just two points as he finished with ninety-seven.  It had been a very thinky game, and with three players was reasonably tight with people taking Actions others wanted.  It was very enjoyable when players were so evenly matched which was reflected in the scores despite very different strategies.

Underwater Cities
– Image by boardGOATS

Black and Blue had been interested in joining the game of Underwater Cities, however, as it was, it was the last game to finish by some mile and would have taken a lot longer with a fourth player.  There wasn’t a sixth player interested in making a second game, so in the end, Black joined Pink who was very keen to give Teal’s new acquisition that he’d been toting about since Pink and Blue had brought it back from Essen for him.  This was the Grand Tour expansion to Flamme Rouge. This is a cycle racing game where players move their two riders forward by drawing and playing cards from that riders specific deck, depleting it as they go.

Flamme Rouge: Grand Tour
– Image by boardGOATS

As in real cycle races, players use slipstreaming to avoid exhaustion, in the game, these are cards that block up players’ hands making dealing with obstacles and moving through the peloton more challenging.  A large part of the new expansion is a campaign mode and there was only time for one game, however, there are some additional features, including some new hilly track and a double right-angle hairpin bend.  These added more interesting features to the parcours.  Like all race games, players usually do best if they can start fast and stay at the front of the pack.  In Flamme Rouge, this is mitigated by the fact that once a card is played it is discarded so players have to make their good cards last the duration of the race while avoiding too much exhaustion.

Flamme Rouge: Grand Tour
– Image by boardGOATS

Teal managed to crash both his bikes, while Black and Purple crashed one each.  Indigo and Navy led for most of the game while Pink tried to maintain a position in the front four or five.  Navy faded as the sprinters wound up for a lunge for the line, with Indigo as Marcel Kittel and Pink as Mark Cavendish.  This time, victory went to the German and the Manx Missile with just piped into second with Navy rolling home in third.  The game had been a lot of fun and the general consensus was that the Grand Tour expansion added some nice new features even when multiple games for a campaign weren’t appropriate.  It hadn’t out-stayed its welcome either, and although Teal headed home, there was time for everyone else to play one more quick game.

Flamme Rouge: Grand Tour
– Image by boardGOATS

The game of choice was Coloretto—something of an old favourite.  This is a really quick game to teach and start playing, with players taking it in turns to either draw a card and add it to one of the trucks, or taking a truck and adding the Chameleons on it to their collection.  The clever part is that largest three sets score positive points following the Triangular series, while any other sets score negative points.  Purple drew the Golden Joker which was picked up by Pink, while Black took the other Joker.  The game was really tight, well, amongst the top three anyhow.  Navy managed to only score positive points, but his thirty-four points was one less than Indigo who took second and who, in turn, scored one point less than the victor, Black.

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

The final table consisted of Pine, Blue, Jade and Sapphire.  After a bit of chit-chat, this group settled on playing Akropolis.  This is a fairly light abstract tile laying game in a similar vein to Taluva or NMBR 9, where tiles placed on higher levels score more points.  In this game, players take a tile from the Market and place it in their City.  The first tile in the market display is always free, the one after costs one stone (the only resource in the game) the next one two stone and so on.  The tiles comprise three conjoined hexes each either a Quarry (which provide Stone when built over), a Plaza, or a District tile.  Tiles can be placed on top of others, but must cover more than one other tile and cannot leave gaps.

Akropolis
– Image by boardGOATS

At the end of the game, tiles that meet the scoring requirements for that colour are multiplied by their height.  As in Kingdomino where the area is multiplied by the number of crowns in it, this District score in Akropolis is multiplied by the number of Plazas in that colour; these totals are added together to give a final total.  This time, Blue scored heavily for her Houses and although Jade almost matched her with his Barracks, he didn’t score much for anything else and Blue had picked up a lot of points for her Markets too.  Together these gave her a bit of a landslide with a total of one hundred and nineteen.  Sapphire and Pine that by the end they had got the hang of things, and fancied giving it another go.

Akropolis
– Image by boardGOATS

The game was punctuated by a discussion about orange juice and lemonade, which is apparently called a “Henry” in these parts though nobody but Jade was aware of it.  Pine commented that where he came from it was more likely to be used to order cocaine.  This time, Blue tried a totally different strategy this time focusing entirely on Houses.  Sapphire’s Markets gave him forty points and Pine’s gave him thirty-four.  These were dwarfed by Jade’s Gardens that gave him sixty points, but they all paled into insignificance compared to Blue’s Houses which gave her one hundred and eight.  Sadly though, with nothing else but a pile of rocks, this left her with exactly the same score as last time—and a tie with Jade, while Sapphire, the most improved player finished in third, just four points behind.

Akropolis
– Image by boardGOATS

Learning Outcome:  The underwater world has a lot of potential.

17th September 2024

After the usual chatter and some food, the interested parties staked their claim to play the “Feature Game“, Stamp Swap.  This is a game where players take on the role of stamp collectors at a convention collecting, trading and then scoring their stamp album.  All the reviews claim it is a light game, but while it is not hugely complex, there is more to the game than appears at first glance.  At its core is the “I cut, You Choose” mechanism that is used in games like Isle of Skye and …aber bitte mit Sahne, but Stamp Swap is nothing like either of these.

Stamp Swap
– Image by boardGOATS

The game takes place over three rounds each with three phases:  Collect, Swap and Show.  In the collect phase, an Event card is revealed and then players take turns to take an item from the central pool.  Once everyone has six items, everyone puts one item aside to Reserve and then splits the rest into two piles for the Swap phase.  Some “I cut, You Choose” games struggle work across a range of player counts, for example, San Marco, really only plays well with three players where one splits the cards into three sets and the others choose.  While the game might work with two, the decisions would be too trivial (though there are variants with a dummy player).

Stamp Swap
– Image by boardGOATS

In contrast, dividing a pile into four would require too many cards and make the decision complex as well as make the game potentially quite “swingy”.  Thus, although the game officially plays three to four players, the mechanism really only works with three.  Stamp Swap avoids this problem with a snake-like mechanism that also negates the need for valuing the hands or the use of money as an intermediate (as in Isle of Skye).  The first player chooses one set and the owner of that set keeps their other set and chooses one from another player.  That player keeps their second set and chooses a set from another player and so on.

Stamp Swap
– Image by boardGOATS

Players then place the stamps in their album and score in the Show Phase.  There are four Goals in each game and each player can score one of these per round, but can only score each only once.  These Goals are different in each game giving a lot of variability, especially as thy combine together in different ways.  At the end of the game, players additionally earn points for the face value of each Stamp, for any Specialist cards they may have, for Stamps that match their personal Theme, and for their achievement in the Finale Contest, while receiving bonus points their place in the Forever Stamp competition.

Stamp Swap
– Image by boardGOATS

The unexpected complexity arises from the stamps themselves.  They come in five different colours, themes and size/shapes.  Some of these stamps are “Cancelled” (and have no face value) and some are “Faded” (and have a negative face value, but may be useful for claiming the Goals).  There is are special gilded Stamps with their own Chocolate theme and a high face value, but cannot be reserved at the end of the Collect phase.  Finally, there are the “Forever” Stamps.  These are Square and are the only Stamps available in the smallest size and have no face value, but are useful for filling tiny holes (should that be required for the Goals) and give bonus points at the end of the game (in much the same way as Pudding do in Sushi Go!).

Stamp Swap
– Image by boardGOATS

It turns out that the game takes quite a lot longer with more players, which was a bit of a surprise given that much of the game is played simultaneously.  This time Ivory led a group of five with Plum, Sapphire, Jade and Teal, while Blue led a group of four comprising Byzantium, Purple and Black.  Ivory’s group were quick off the mark and first to get going after the rules explanation.  Their Goals gave points for:  Stamps of one Colour in one Group; sets of all five Theme Stamps; Large square Stamps, and Cancelled Stamps not on the edge, while their Finale Contest gave points for the number of Stamps completely surrounded by other Stamps.  Ivory’s personal scoring objective was Space Themed Stamps, Plum’s were Animals, Sapphire’s were Vehicles, Jade’s were Monuments and Teal’s were Flowers.

Stamp Swap
– Image by boardGOATS

Everyone began by feeling their way a bit, especially as the first round added additional Specialists—cards that give extra powers for the rest of the game.  Plum made a “bee line” for these, while Jade and Teal focused on the Large Square Stamps, scoring the related bonus, and giving them an early lead.  Jade also managed to “hide a gold stamp (face down)” and ended up with it in his collect as no one took it.  Plum scored for the Cancelled Stamps first, as she had picked up a lot of them.  As nobody chose his set, Ivory ended up with all his own Stamps, which he thought was great at first, but then had second thoughts as he ended the first round at the back of the pack.

Stamp Swap
– Image by boardGOATS

In the second round, the event was “Rewarding finds” giving two points immediately for taking a face down Stamp, which everyone was keen to do, especially Plum, who quickly caught up with Jade and Teal as a result.  Plum made good use of her “Swap one for three face down Stamps before splitting your collection” to grab extra Stamps.  Teal managed to hang on to the First Player token for most of the game and also took a lead on the Forever Stamps. Sapphire grabbed an exhibitor for Yellow Stamps and proceeded to take Stamps to match wherever possible (both from the pool and from other peoples piles). Ivory made a point of collecting a full set of five different Theme Stamps, scoring nine points, as well as managing to keep a valuable face-down Gold stamp.

Stamp Swap
– Image by boardGOATS

Going into the final round, Ivory was still trailing significantly behind everyone else who were bunched tightly together.  This time the Event gave bonus points for taking Stamps that matched the Theme of their neighbours, which made the game slightly meaner as everyone was taking Stamps others wanted.  Plum was again using the additional Stamps she was getting from her Specialist to shape what she was going to end up with, managing to get three complete sets for twenty-seven points. Jade also managed to score well for this in the final round, as well as for the coloured Stamp cards he collected. Sapphire was similar with his vehicles and Yellow stamps, as well as scoring scoring for Large Square Stamps.

Stamp Swap
– Image by boardGOATS

Teal fell a little behind, taking fewer points for the Cancelled Stamps on the edge and he also failed to collect any of the Flower Stamps he needed as everyone kept taking them during the swap phase (in order to get complete sets). Ivory meanwhile focused on getting as many Large Square Stamps adding to the three he already had, giving him a massive fourty-two points taking him from behind and giving him a significantly lead.  In the final scoring, Teal took the bonus for the most Forever Stamps giving him ten points while and everyone but Plum tied for second with a single Forever Stamp, giving six points.

Stamp Swap
– Image by boardGOATS

Everyone managed to get at least one gold stamp, but Ivory had the most valuable total face value.  Plum scored most for specialists, although most people had at least one, so this made little difference to the scores. Everyone scored well for the Finale Contest, especially Jade, and Plum, but it was not enough to overhaul Ivory’s lead.  He finished with a total of a hundred and forty-eight, ten more than Plum who took second place, who was a handful of points ahead of Sapphire in third.  On the next table, Blue took longer to explain the rules, but once they got going, they soon caught up with the first group and ended up finishing just before.

Stamp Swap
– Image by boardGOATS

Their first Event card was “Generous Gifts” so after the Collect phase, players choose one collected items to score and then pass on to their neighbour.  Everyone quickly chose their highest scoring Stamp, then realised that meant they would lose it, so had a bit of a re-think.  It was then that the group began to really appreciate the quandary at the centre of the game:  it was all very well taking nice tiles, but they were no use if someone else took them.  This tension was particularly obvious in the final round of the first game where the “Mine not Yours” Event gave points for taking Stamps that matched a neighbour’s theme—while players lost the opportunity to pick up Stamps they wanted in the Collect Phase, they had the chance to take them in the Swap phase.

Stamp Swap
– Image by boardGOATS

The Events in the second and third rounds were “More to See” and “Stamps Forever”.  These had a much smaller impact on the game play, or at least it felt like that, though the Forever Stamps were all collected in the final round.  The Finale Contest was “Empty Regions” which gave three points for each empty region.  Black showed everyone how to to maximise this and from the end of the first round, everyone’s collections began to look like every-expanding checker boards.  Comparing the final album boards between the two games, the layouts were completely different with compact groups for the first game and gappy sprawling displays for the second game.

Stamp Swap
– Image by boardGOATS

Black picked up the bonus for having the most the Forever Stamps, and Byzantium, who by his own admission had been “pants during the game” picked up loads of points in the dying stages.  Purple had done the best with her personal Goal—Flowers, while Blue had a plethora of rare, valuable Stamps.  During the game it had been unclear who was really in the lead as the scores seesawed a bit, but Byzantium’s lunge for the line gave him the lead when it mattered and he finished with a hundred and forty-six points, seven more than the runner up, Blue.  All in all, everyone had enjoyed the game, though the overwhelming feel was that there was much more to the game than the reviews claimed, but that’s a good thing.

Stamp Swap
– Image by boardGOATS

Cobalt was the only person with a strong aversion to playing Stamp Swap, but Pine, Lime and Pink were all keep to play one of their favourite games, Zoo Break, another game that wasn’t really his type.  In he end, Cobalt graciously joined in the keepers of Bedlam Zoo, trying to keep the animals under control.  The game is a cooperative game, where players take it in turns to roll a die to determine how many actions they get, take the actions like acquiring
supplies, capturing animals, locking enclosures etc., before cards are drawn to see what animals escape and then move towards the exit.  The aim is to get all the animals back into their cages and lock them before five animals  or anything dangerous gets out.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

The group chose to use the standard difficulty (two “Phew” cards), but with the “Faulty Lock” variant.  This is where players roll to see if the lock holds when one of the locked up animals tries to escape; it adds a but of interest to the end of the game, however, unfortunately this time, the group didn’t get that far.  They managed to lock up the Elephants, Tigers and the Rhino, but the mischievous Pandas remained rogue until the end of the game.  They weren’t the problem, however, that was the Snakes.  Three harmless Garter Snakes got out, but they were followed by a Viper, and as it left, so did the group’s zoo license…

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

With Bedlam Zoo sadly closed prematurely, the group moved on to a couple of quick fillers.  The first of these was No Thanks!, a really clever little “cards with numbers” game.  The idea is that players either take the face up card or pay a chip to pass the problem on to the next player with the aim being to be the player with the lowest total at the end.  The clever part is that if a player has a run, only the lowest value card counts, but the deck also has some cards removed at random.  This makes it a proper gambling and “push your luck” game.  This time, Cobalt was the top scorer, but the winner with eighteen was Pink.

No Thanks!
– Image by boardGOATS

There was just time for one more game, Coloretto.  This is another simple and clever card game, this time the essence of the core mechanism in the bigger game, Zooloretto.  The idea is that players either draw a card and add it to a truck, or take a truck and add its contents to their collection.  At the end of the game players score their three largest sets positively, with negative points for any other sets.  The clever part is the use of the Triangular number sequence which means the first card in a set is worth one point, while the sixth is worth six.  There were the usual questions about Joker cards which resulted in questions being called across the room, but in spite of taking all three Jokers in the deck, Pink was just second by three points behind Lime’s total of forty.

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

Learning Outcome:  A game about Philately can be more than just Stamp Collecting.

23rd July 2024

Blue and Pink were still eating when everyone else rolled in and seemed quite content to chat.  It took Blue two attempts to get the first game rolling, with Jade leading Cobalt, Crimson and Plum to the other side of the room.  Pink moved to join Pine who wanted to play his new acquisition with Black and Purple, which left Blue and Lime to lead Byzantium, Sapphire and Cyan in the “Feature Game“, the Alpine expansion for Forest Shuffle.  This is was chosen to mark the announcement of the Spiel des Jahres Awards, as Forest Shuffle, featured on the recommended list and has been popular with the group.

Forest Shuffle
– Image by boardGOATS

Blue made a bit of a meal of explaining the rules, but really they are very simple.  On their turn, players either take two cards from the market and add them to their hand (with a hand limit of ten), or play a card from their hand into their tableau.  There are three different types of cards.  Tree cards are the central cards around which Critter cards are played.  Then there is the first set of Critter cards which are divided into two, left and right with an animal on each half.  Finally, there are Critter cards which are divided into two, the canopy at the top and the undergrowth at the bottom.  The Critter cards are half-tucked under the Tree cards, so only one animal, flora or fauna is visible.

Forest Shuffle
– Image by boardGOATS

The difficult part of the game is getting the cards to work together efficiently to give extra actions and, ultimately, points.  The Alpine expansion doesn’t change the game significantly, just adding more variety to the cards, adding more opportunities for scoring.  For example, it adds an extra Butterfly which give players more points if they have a complete the set.  This time, Blue started with a hand full or Hares, making her initial strategy obvious.  Sapphire was less fortunate, so Blue and Lime suggested that starting with Trees was always a good way to go as players can’t do anything without them.  He also had some Butterflies, so that was where he went next.

Forest Shuffle: Alpine Expansion
– Image by boardGOATS

Lime built up a collection of Birds, and since he advertised his strategy to the group, everyone else was able to take cards he wanted.  This is a key part of the game:  some cards give points for the number of something you have, so having more of both multiplies the score.  For example, Hares give one point for every Hare a player has.  Thus, one Hare gives one point, but Blue’s seven Hares mean that first Hare scored seven points.  More to the point, every other Hare also scored seven points giving her forty-nine points just for her Hares.  Meanwhile, Byzantium was going Bats, and Cyan was experimenting with Deer.

Forest Shuffle: Alpine Expansion
– Image by boardGOATS

The game ends when the third Winter card is drawn from the deck, so after the second, everyone got very nervy as they tried to complete all their plans and play all the cards they wanted to.  Each time someone drew a card from the deck, it was with bated breath.  The final stage seemed to last forever, and although the third Winter card wasn’t the last card in the deck, it was close, and when it was drawn the game ended immediately. And then it was time for the scores:  everyone assumed that Blue’s husk of Hares would give her victory, but it was actually quite much closer than they thought.  Although Blue finished with a hundred and sixty-five, Byzantium was only twenty points behind.

Forest Shuffle: Alpine Expansion
– Image by boardGOATS

Byzantium was ready to leave, but for everyone else there was just time for something really quick.  So as everyone else was still playing, the remaining four decided on a quick game of Coloretto.  This is an old game, but one that was on the Spiel des Jahres Award “Recommended List” in 2003.  Remarkably, Cyan and Sapphire were new to it, but it is a super easy and quick game to play, but with tactical decisions to make.  It is also one that can essentially be taught as you go:  either turn over the top Chameleon card and add it to one of the Trucks, or take one Truck.  Each Truck can contain a maximum of three Chameleons and once everyone has taken a Truck, the round ends.

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

At the end of the game, players score each group of coloured Chameleons, with the largest three groups giving positive points and any others scoring negatively.  There are a small number of cards that just give straight points and balancing these with Chameleons is part of the challenge.  The end is triggered when the end of game card is drawn and then the round is played to completion.  This time, everyone kept their negative scores down, while Cyan went for the pure point cards, collecting fourteen points, more than half his score, by that route.  The winner was Lime, however, who was imperious and won by some distance with a total of thirty-three.

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

Meanwhile, on the next table Jade was teaching Cobalt, Crimson and Plum the Spiel des Jahres 2024 nominee, In the Footsteps of Darwin.  The premise of this is that players are naturalists aboard the Beagle helping Charles Darwin finish his book On the Origin of Species, studying animals, carrying out cartographic surveys, publishing their findings, and developing theories. On their turn, players study an animal or take inspiration from a character by choosing one of the three tiles in the row or column marked by the Beagle, and placing it onto their naturalist’s Notebook. This may be an animal to study or a character from the Beagle’s previous journey and will give an immediate bonus or a scoring bonuses.

In the Footsteps of Darwin
– Image by boardGOATS

After placing the tile, the Beagle is moved round the market, with the distance dependent on the tile chosen and a new tile is drawn to fill the empty space on the journey board.  At the end of the game, the player who contributed the most to On the Origin of Species wins.  At it’s heart, In the Footsteps of Darwin is a fairly simple set collection and “make the most of what’s available” game. Players obtain an additional scoring objective when they place a tile on top of a previous one, covering up any icons, so a key part of the game is the conflict between points being gained verses points being lost.

In the Footsteps of Darwin
– Image by boardGOATS

There’s also quite a bit of luck invoiced, as a player may need one or two specific tiles that don’t come out, or that get taken by someone else before they have the opportunity to do so.  The group found it was very quick to play, taking just forty minutes including teaching.  Plum’s  starting goal was points for tiles in the upper right quadrant, but in the absence of tiles that fitted that criteria she focused instead on collecting Charts and Compasses as these score points equal to the number of these multiplied together.

In the Footsteps of Darwin
– Image by boardGOATS

One advantage of these is that once a Compass has been collected, the tile can be covered without loosing any points. Cobalt didn’t worry about that at all, covering loads of tiles to get more Theories banners which give points.  Ultimately, everyone’s score was pretty similar at the end of the first game but Jade took victory as he was most effective with the Chart/Compass scoring.  As it was so quick, the group decided to give it a second try—this the scores all improved.  This time the victor was Crimson, who was again the most effective with the Charts/Compasses, but also scored well in other areas, as did Cobalt who came second again.

In the Footsteps of Darwin
– Image by boardGOATS

From there, the group moved on to a game of Looot, which is too recent a release to have been acknowledged in the Spiel des Jahres awards.  It has been popular amongst the members of the group that have played it so far, however, and may well get an award next year.  In this game, players gain points by gathering resources and capturing buildings to try to develop their Fjord, fill their long ships and complete buildings. The winner is the player with the most riches and is crowned Jarl of the Vikings. The game is played over several rounds until each player has played all their Vikings, giving a maximum of thirteen turns, each with a simple structure.

Looot
– Image by boardGOATS

Players start by placing their Viking on a Resource tile on the central board adjacent to another Viking of any colour.  They then take the associated Resource and place it on their personal board.  If possible, they then use their Resources to capture a Building and place that on their board, take a Long Ship and also place it on their board, use a Shield, or complete a Construction Site and finally grab a Trophy.  Looot is quite a light game, but with enough decision space to be interesting.  Last time was a three-player game, but this time, with four, players get another map area, which the group arranged to give a wide play area.

Looot
– Image by boardGOATS

The board layout made it easier to get to more areas of the map relatively early in the game, but there was still plenty of competition for the Towers.  Like last time, Plum decided not to worry about all the home tiles and focused on gold, which was good, but not enough on its own.  Cobalt scored massively for Castles by getting plenty of them plus the equivalent Long Boats.  Cobalt started on that strategy largely by accident, before he had got a real understanding of game-play and a full appreciation of how they increased the Castle scoring and matched the requirements he could fulfill.

Looot
– Image by boardGOATS

Crimson had a nice balance of increased score for Towers and Houses, while Jade built up a huge pile of Wood.  Unlike last time, things didn’t just come together at the end for Plum, and nobody else could compete with Cobalt’s Castles and he took victory with one hundred and twenty-one, fourteen points ahead of Crimson in second.  It had been a good game though, and as players become more experienced, they will be increasingly able to determine the best scoring opportunity from the start and how to optimise the mini game that is building their Fjord. With experienced players, this could be quite ruthless with players trying to block each other and prevent objectives.

Looot
– Image by boardGOATS

In the third group, meanwhile, Pine was introducing his new acquisition, the old game, Tonga Bonga, to Pink, Black and Purple.  This is a sailing race game a bit like the 2008 Spiel des Jahres recommended Jamaica.  In Tonga Bonga, players pilot their ship around the archipelago with the goal of visiting four of the five remote islands and returning to Tonga Bonga Bay.  Each player has room for three sailors on their ship, each of which represented by dice and indicate how fat the ship will move.  At the start of the round, players decide how much they are prepared to pay for the sailors who will serve as their captain and first mate that round (the Cabin Boy always works for nothing).

Tonga Bonga
– Image by boardGOATS

Players then simultaneously roll their dice, and take it in turns assign their dice to the other players’ ships, in return for the money offered.  In a mechanism vaguely reminiscent of that in the really rather vicious game, Vanuatu, if a player tries to place a higher value die where someone has already assigned a die, the lower value one is displaced and bumped to a lesser and usually less lucrative role.  Thus, all things being equal, the ship offering the most money will get the highest value dice and the most moves, though of course, players can work together to disrupt this behaviour. One side of each die has a Seasick Sailor (effectively zero), so the maximum value dice are five.

Tonga Bonga
– Image by boardGOATS

Once all the dice have been assigned, players move their ships racing to reach the islands, leaving one of their tokens there.  Landing on an island, earns $25 from the bank, but the player has to pay $5 to each player who landed there ahead of them.  Pine explained the rules and before long, everyone was sailing.  Pink got a bit of a lead by using his winnings to buy more moves and visit more islands.  He had been feeling that the game was maybe a bit “broken”, but as is usually the case when a game feels like that, it was all down to the “rules malfunction”, but it wasn’t until the final round that the rules were “clarified”.

Tonga Bonga
– Image by boardGOATS

Instead of the winner being the player to cross the line first with any left over money used as a tie-breaker, once a player has visited four islands they return to Tonga Bonga Bay and trigger the game end—and whoever has the most money wins.  Pink crossed the line and claimed the moral victory, as he was playing by the original rules.  Everyone else was quite happy with the “updated rules” though, which left Pine the victor with Purple in second and Black just behind.  Pink blamed “Evil Pine” for the mishap, but was eventually won round with a bottle of dubiously flavoured cider.

Tonga Bonga
– Image by boardGOATS

Although the debate had been audible by the players at the neighbouring tables, ultimately it was all taken in good part and the game had been a lot of fun and showed its age less than Lifeboats that was played a few weeks back and was only five years older.  From there though, the group moved on to a game of the 2021 Spiel des Jahres winner, Kingdomino.  This is a clever little game where players are building a kingdom made out of double-headed, domino-like tiles.  As in Dominoes, the ends of the tiles have to match, or at least it has to match with one tile tile already in the player’s kingdom.

Kingdomino
– Image by boardGOATS

The really clever part of the game is the double market, where the tiles are taken in reverse order of value.  The double market means that when a player takes the tile for the current round, they choose which tile they will get in the next round.  Thus, taking the lowest value tile this round means they will have first choice next round.  Players score for each contiguous area of Terrain—the number of points is equal to the number of squares multiplied by the number of Crowns featuring in it.  This time, Pink concentrated on Wheat Fields and Sea, Pine focused on Sea and Meadow while Black concentrated on Woodland with a smattering of points from Marsh, Mountain and Wheat fields.

Kingdomino
– Image by boardGOATS

In contrast, Purple prioritised her four contiguous areas forfeiting the “Harmony” and “Middle Kingdom” bonus points for using all the tiles to give a square kingdom with a central castle.  Pine took victory with a massive seventy-three with Pink and Black tying for second with sixty points.  This group wasn’t done by any means and swiftly moved on to a quick game of Sushi Go!.  This is one of those games that takes a mechanism that is a relatively minor part of other games and distills it into its purest form in the game.  Coloretto does the same for the central market mechanism used in the 2007 Spiel des Jahres winner, Zooloretto, and Sushi Go! does it for the card drafting mechanism in the 2011 Kennerspiel des Jahres winning game, 7 Wonders.

Sushi Go!
– Image by boardGOATS

In Sushi Go!, players start with a hand of cards, keep one and pass the rest on, repeating until all the cards have been distributed.  As well as being a core mechanism in 7 Wonders, this “Card Drafting” is also often used to try to reduce the luck of the draw at the start of games like Terraforming Mars and Agricola (both also acknowledged by the Spiel des Jahres committee).  In Sushi Go!, players are using the card drafting to collect sushi and, most importantly Pudding!  The game is played over three rounds, with cards drafted to the left, then right and then left again, scoring points at the end of each round.

Sushi Go!
– Image by boardGOATS

This time, Pink and Black tied for the high-scoring first round, with Pine just behind.  Pine made up for it on the second round by taking it convincingly, however, with everyone else scoring very badly.  The third round was more even again, this time won by Black with Purple taking second.  That resulted in a three-way tie between Black, Pink and Pine, but at the end of the game, the player with the most Pudding cards gains six points, with the one with the fewest losing six points.  Unusually for Pink (as he has quite a sweet tooth), he had eschewed Puddings, while Black had the most giving him what ended up being a quite convincing victory.

Sushi Go!
– Image by boardGOATS

There was just time for a single round of Love Letter (a game from the 2014 Spiel des Jahres recommended list).  This is a sixteen card game where players start with a card, draw a second and then play one.  The idea is to try to be the last play in or the player with the highest value card when the deck runs out.  The theme is all about getting as close as possible to the Princess card, which has the highest value.  This led to a discussion about real princesses and how close people had been to them.  It turns out that Purple has met a real one, Princess Nina who lives in a massive house in Cheltenham.  During the game, Pink was the Princess, but was spotted and knocked out, leaving Black to take another win.

Love Letter
– Image by boardGOATS

Learning Outcome:  The Spiel des Jahres committee may reward lighter games, but they are good games.

14th May 2024

Pine was already sitting outside marking his birthday, when Blue and and Pink rocked up and ordered their tea.  Jade and Sapphire soon joined the group, ferried by newcomer, Tangerine who not only brought gamers, but also his shiny new copy of the “Feature Game“, Faraway, which he had won at Gweeplefest a few days earlier.  This game is has been a bit of a hidden gem whose popularity is rapidly gaining traction as more people play it.  It is quite a simple game, but one which really messes with the head.  Some of the group played it a few weeks back and it was so popular that it seemed a good idea to Feature it so more of the group could try it.

Faraway
– Image by boardGOATS

The story is that players are exploring the mysterious land of Alula in search of its secrets, meeting its inhabitants and listing its wonders in order to gain more fame than everyone else.  In practice, however, it is a fairly simple little card game with a market with a trick-taking type element.  Players simultaneously chose one of the numbered cards from their hand and starting with the the player that played the lowest card (similar to 6 Nimmt! or Kingdomino), everyone takes it in turns to choose one from the market to add to their hand.  Players then simultaneously choose another card, and again, choose one to add to their hand.  The game ends after everyone has played a total of eight cards, and then everyone scores.

Faraway
– Image by boardGOATS

There are a couple of very clever things about the game.  Firstly, if the card someone plays is numbered higher than their previous card, they take a card from the Sanctuary deck.  These cards a really important because of the second clever element, the scoring.  Each card has a number and a colour, while some also have resources and some have also have scoring conditions.  The scoring is clever because the cards are played left to right, but the scoring is from right to left—at first glance, this looks like it makes things easy, because early in the game players find out what they need to get points and can then focus on getting the resources they need as the game progresses.

Faraway
– Image by boardGOATS

However, the scoring is tensioned against the ability to get Sanctuary bonus cards. This is because the scoring cards are generally those that have a higher number and are therefore the ones players want to play first (following them with resource cards which generally have a lower face value).  To get a Sanctuary card though, players have to play a higher value card than the immediately preceding one, and Sanctuary cards are very useful because they are eligible for scoring regardless of when they are played.  Thus, trying to play cards increasing and decreasing in value to score the most points backwards really messes with players’ heads!

Faraway
– Image by boardGOATS

Tangerine, started one game and explained the rules to half the group, comprising Plum, Byzantium, Blue, Pink and Pine, while he ate his supper.  Meanwhile, Jade and Sapphire took their copy to a neighbouring table where they were joined by Teal, Black and Purple, and started a second game.  Although it is a very simple game, the backwards forwards up and down thing got to several of the group at various points, including Blue (who lost the ability to count), Teal (who did all his scoring forwards instead of backwards), Pine (who struggled with the how maps worked) and Purple (who couldn’t get her head round the reverse scoring).  Jade’s game was the first to finish, with Sapphire beating jade into second place by a single point and Black taking third.

Faraway
– Image by boardGOATS

There was a general appreciation of the art and the mechanism though the theme was a bit invisible.  There had been such confusion, however, that the group decided to “do a Lime” and play again.  This time, the finishing order was exactly the same, but the game wasn’t as close with Sapphire’s eighty-two being the highest score of the evening.  On the other table, Plum was the victor with seventy, followed by Tangerine and Byzantium in third.  This game had taken a little longer, and with six, there is a lot of downtime, so although everyone had enjoyed it, the group decided to split into two groups of three.  Blue tempted Plum and Sapphire to a game of Calico with cries of “Kittens!”, while Pink and Pine lured Tangerine into a game of Ticket to Ride: San Francisco.

Ticket to Ride: San Francisco
– Image by boardGOATS

San Francisco is one of the smaller city versions of Ticket to Ride.  The game play is much the same as the original, but the maps are smaller, players have fewer pieces and they only play a maximum of four.  In all the games, players take it in turns to take coloured cards into their hand from the market, or play cards to place pieces on the board connecting locations to satisfy tickets and score points.  Each version of the game has its own specific unique rules, and this one is no exception with players collecting Souvenirs which give points at the end of the game.  Players collect these by building a route (in this case made of trolley cars rather than trains) to the cities where they are available.

Ticket to Ride: San Francisco
– Image by boardGOATS

Each player can only collect one of each Souvenir, but a full set of seven gives twelve points, which is a lot.  Tickets are also always key though.  This time, Pink escaped early from Alcatraz to Twin Peaks which gave him a high scoring eight points.  Unlike Pine (who always seems to draw routes he’s already completed), Tangerine was unlucky and and instead picked up some negative points late in the game.  It was very close between Pink and Pine though, but the Souvenirs made the difference and Pink (with five) just edged it, beating Pine (who only had two Souvenirs) by three points.

Ticket to Ride: San Francisco
– Image by boardGOATS

Meanwhile, the kitty-philes were playing the extremely frustrating game Calico, which is all about trying to entice cats to come and sleep on a patchwork quilt by making it with the patterns they like.  In this game, players take it in turns to place a coloured, patterned tile from their hand into their quilt board before taking a replacement from the market.  Everyone had played it before, but it had been a while, so the rules needed a bit of revision.  Each player starts with three tiles in a fixed location with scoring criteria for the neighbouring tiles—satisfying these for either colour or pattern gives points, with more points for for those that satisfy both (which is not easy).

Calico
– Image by boardGOATS

Players then also receive a coloured button for every group of three adjacent tiles of the same colour (with a bonus if they get all six possible colours).  Finally, there are the cats that give Calico its name.  This time the cats in question were Almond, Tibbit and Shop Cat (from the Kickstarter Promo).  Almond was attracted by a group of five tiles of one of the patters in a close packed predefined shape while Tibbit found a set of four tiles of one of the given patterns in any shape most appealing.  Shop Cat was lured to the player with the longest connected chain of tiles in one of the given patterns with the player with the second longest attracting a smaller cat (worth fewer points).

Calico
– Image by boardGOATS

This last one was the subject of some debate as Byzantium ended up with both the longest and second longest chain and it was unclear from the rules whether he would get both.  In the end he allowed the smaller Shop Cat to wander off, but fortunately it didn’t make any difference to the placings.  Almond looked by far the most challenging kitty to attract and initially it looked impossible without failing on the fixed starting challenges.  Plum thought she had made a mess of things, but Byzantium pointed out how Almond could be enticed  using some of the partial tiles around the border of her player board and she was the only one to ultimately have that particular kitty to cuddle.

Calico
– Image by boardGOATS

Blue started badly, and in this game, when that happens things usually only get worse, which they did.  Byzantium and Plum both picked up twenty-seven points for their buttons, but in both starting tiles and kitties, Byzantium had the edge (even without the second Shop Cat).  In the end his final score of sixty-one points gave him a significant margin of victory, by seven points.  Everyone agreed that Calico is a good game, but a very frustrating one when players can’t get the tiles they need.  So Byzantium echoed everyone’s feelings when he commented, “That was fun, but very frustrating—I’ll be ready to play it again in another eighteen months…”

Calico
– Image by boardGOATS

As Faraway and Ticket to Ride had both finished, Tangerine took Jade and Sapphire home and Teal also headed off.  That left Black, Purple, Pine and Pink to play a quick game of the old favourite, Coloretto.  This is a very simple set collecting game, that makes a great filler.  The idea is that players either take the top coloured chameleon card from the deck and place it on a cart, or take a card and add the cards to their collection.  Players score points for their largest three sets (up to six cards, worth twenty-one points), while everything else scores negatively.  The player with the most points is the winner.  Playing with the Jubiläumsausgabe edition, as usual, there was a discussion about what the Golden Joker does and how it differs from the normal Joker.

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

In the end, Pink was the victor and, for the second game in a row, pushed Pine into second place, this time with Black just behind.  The evening looked to be ending there, when a couple of people from the bar came over and asked what we were doing.  That led to a fairly wide-ranging discussion about Monopoly, Cluedo and Mystery of the Abbey amongst other games.  The evening really did come to an end eventually, after Pink and Blue had dragged one of the interested parties into a quick game of No Thanks!.  Unfortunately, there was a misunderstanding and he top-scored with ninety-three, but hopefully he understood that some of the games we play are not that complicated.

No Thanks!
– Image by boardGOATS

Learning Outcome:  Playing forwards and backwards at the same time makes heads hurt.

16th April 2024

Everyone seemed more keen on standing around and chatting that playing, but eventually, once everyone had arrived, people started dividing up into groups.  Ivory began by leading Jade, Sapphire and Cobalt to the other side of the room to play the “Feature Game“, which was the new “hotness” Let’s Go! To Japan.  In this game, players are travelers planning, then experiencing their own dream holiday in Japan.  Played over thirteen rounds, players draw activity cards place them in different days in their week-long itinerary. These can’t-miss tourist attractions have players traveling between Tokyo and Kyoto as they try to maximize their experience by optimising their activities while balancing resources.

Let's Go! To Japan
– Image by boardGOATS

In each of the thirteen rounds, players draw cards according to the pre-organised sequence.  For example, there are two decks of cards (Tokyo and Kyoto), and for the first four rounds, players take one card from each deck, keep one and add it to their tableau assigning it to one of the days of their dream, then pass the second card to their neighbour.  In the fifth round, players take the four cards they’ve been given and then they place two in their tableau and pass two on, and so on.  Once eighteen cards have been played (three on each of the six days), the game is over and players take their planned trip, activating each of their cards in order, starting on Monday and work their way through to Saturday.

Let's Go! To Japan
– Image by boardGOATS

There is a catch:  where there is a swap between the two decks, players have to move between the cities of Tokyo and Kyoto by playing a Luxury Train Ticket which they can acquire during the game.  Each of these is worth two points.  If players do not have enough tokens to cover each change, they play a Regular Train Ticket from the supply which costs them two points.  Activating cards involves moving the players’ five Experience tokens along a track, increasing or decreasing their Mood, Stress and Happiness, gaining points and then evaluating the requirements for the Highlight of the Day depicted on the final card of the day.  If these requirements have been fulfilled, the player gets bonus points and the player with the most points at the end of the game is the winner.

Let's Go! To Japan
– Image by boardGOATS

The game rattled along very quickly with swift turns and the added bonus that setup was quite rapid too.  As a result, it was easily under forty-five minutes before everyone was explaining their plan and scoring it.  That said it was hard to keep track of what everyone was doing.  Ivory was the first to fill a day and managed to get everything aligned to get the top bonus of a Luxury Train ticket. Although this was very nice, it in no way indicated Ivory was going to get a big score.  Jade and Cobalt quickly followed suit, Cobalt also gaining Luxury Train Tickets (which he got quite a few of throughout the game), and Jade got quite a lot of the second best reward, choosing Wild Tokens that would be really useful at the end of game to ensure meeting Highlight of the Day/End of Game objectives.

Let's Go! To Japan
– Image by boardGOATS

Sapphire was spreading his activities out a little bit more, but as the game went on he also managed to build a large store of wild tokens.  At the start of the game, Jade and Sapphire (who were not sitting next to each other) focused more on Kyoto, whereas Ivory and Cobalt were playing a lot more Tokyo cards.  Inevitably, however,  everyone ended up going to both cities and need Train Tickets as a result. Cobalt and Jade were the only people who choose to grab research tokens; Cobalt used one of these mid-game and managed to manipulate his hand so he ensured he passed nothing of use to Jade, much to his annoyance.  Otherwise, everyone worked on their mental health and managed to keep their stress down scoring positive points for the trip.

Let's Go! To Japan
– Image by boardGOATS

At the end of the game, Sapphire, Jade and Ivory had minimized their travel between the two cities though, whereas Cobalt required a lot of trains:  as he had lots of Luxury Train Tickets he actually increased his score significantly with these.  Jade had not picked up enough Luxury Train Tickets, so was stuck on commuter trains causing him to lose a lot of points. Sapphire ended up with a quick return trip between Kyoto and Tokyo on his last day, but that was acceptable because you should always go out your way for Sake!

Let's Go! To Japan
– Image by boardGOATS

Scoring took longer than usual as everyone gave a detailed description of their trip. Both Cobalt and Sapphire scored well on every day of their trip, with Cobalt slightly ahead thanks to his Luxury Train Tickets.  Sapphire managed to complete all his Highlight of the Day objectives though without using his wild tokens, so he cashed these in at the end of the game to push all his tokens into the next scoring zone and subsequently won the game by two points from Cobalt.  It had been a highly enjoyable experience though, enhanced by the beautiful components, especially the extremely pretty, but totally over the top ceramic component bowls!

Let's Go! To Japan
– Image by boardGOATS

From there, the group then played a game of Faraway, a light game set on the mysterious continent of Alula with its ever-changing geography, shaped after the rhythm of the seasons.  On each turn, players play a card from a hand of three.  As play is simultaneous, players must take into account the priority system in all their choices—being last to pick a card leaves fewer options and often less profitable choices for later turns.  During the game, players will play a row of eight cards in front of them, from left to right. These cards represent the regions they will come across while exploring the lands. Characters on these cards will give victory points if the player later fulfills the conditions they demand.  At the end of the game, players walk back along the same route, scoring cards in the opposite order to that they were played in—and therein lies the heart of the game-play.

Faraway
– Image by boardGOATS

Throughout the game, the cards played serve both to set new objectives, and to meet ones played previously.  This time, Ivory started quickly out of the traps playing the highest card and subsequently getting the last pick in the following round, which was a minor hindrance. As the game went on, the order of picking the cards changed each time and everyone managed to pick first at some point, although it did seem like Sapphire and Ivory had the greatest varieties, mostly either being first or last!  Jade was very quick off the mark getting lots of maps which gave him a significant card advantage throughout the game as he could look at four or five cards and pick the best one. Ivory also didn’t do too badly with maps.

Faraway
– Image by boardGOATS

It eventually became clear that Jade had managed to play his cards in such a way he was always playing a higher card than his last card giving him an additional secondary card, but he was also able to fulfill the requirements to score the objective on that card even though it would need fulfilling earlier in the journey.  Come the end of game scoring and going on their journey, both Cobalt and Ivory had slightly take their eye of the ball and missed fulfilling the requirements of some of their cards and thus missed out on points they though we were going to get. In the end, it was very close for second place Sapphire just taking it, while everyone was thrashed by Jade.

Faraway
– Image by boardGOATS

On the next table, Green was keen to play Lost Ruins of Arnak, and was eventually joined by Black and Plum.  This game combines deck-building and worker placement with resource management.  Players start with six cards in their deck, two Money, two Compasses and two Fear cards, and draw five of these to play.  As in the original deck-builder, Dominion, or in the racing games, Flamme Rouge and Snow Tails, Fear cards clog up players’ decks and more are acquired as the game progresses.  But also as in Dominion, there are ways to “exile” cards during the game.  So, players can try to keep a tight deck with minimal cards, or try to buy lots of cards that work well together.

Lost Ruins of Arnak
– Image by boardGOATS

Players then have two meeples each that can be sent to locations on the map, to either discover or use an action Location.  These generally give Resources plus some additions like draw a card, or gain a Fear card etc.. Each new site also has a Creature guarding it, which, if beaten, will give points and a small one-time bonus.  The Research Track is where players spend three of the resources, Tablets, Arrows and Jewels. Each player has two tokens which move up the same track giving different rewards as it ascends. Thematically, you can’t write stuff in the notebook until you find it with your magnifying glass, so the former can never overtake the latter on the track. And of course, the notebook gives cooler rewards.

Lost Ruins of Arnak
– Image by boardGOATS

Players get one action each per turn, until everyone has passed signalling the end of the round, and the game finishes after five rounds.  At the end of the game, Points are awarded for Cards, for progress on the Research Track, for discovering Locations and for beating Creatures; the player with the most points at the end is the winner.  This time, early in the game, Green pointed out to Plum that she could use an Idol gained by defeating a Guardian to give her the resources she needed to go up the Research Track.  That gave Plum an Assistant and she picked one that turned a Boot into an Arrowhead.

Lost Ruins of Arnak
– Image by boardGOATS

Green bought the card Plum had been eying up, which let players rid themselves of Fear cards (worth minus one point), and therefore seemed like a good use for a Boot/Fear.  It was pointed out later, however, that any card could be used in place of the Boot as all other transport types work for Boot icons.  Plum then got an Assistant that could upgrade a resource, which in practice she used turn Arrowheads into a Rubies as that was all she had by the end of the rounds.  She also managed to get ahead with her Explore magnifying glass token and was the first to a new level on a couple of occasions, which gave her valuable bonuses.

Lost Ruins of Arnak
– Image by boardGOATS

Green picked up a couple of Fear cards from leaving Guardians undefeated; Black got at least one as well, but Plum managed to dodge them.  Both Black and Green got useful Artifact Cards where they could get lots of resources.  It was a little way in that the group noticed the slight Rules Malfunction:  although players were putting their new cards at the bottom of their Draw pile, players were then shuffling the Draw and Discard piles together before drawing new cards.  This gave an extra bit of randomness that this time, worked in Plum’s favour.  For example, she had an item card that gave a Compass per worker when it was played, and it seemed to put in a lot of appearances.  In contrast, all the cards Green had bought didn’t come out until the final round—he got the balance of the bad luck.

Lost Ruins of Arnak
– Image by boardGOATS

Black picked up an Assistant which helped him cycle through his cards which helped mitigate the randomness a little, though there were a couple of occasions when someone took the location he had been working towards. Right at the end of the game, when Plum had managed to reach the top of the Explore/Research Track with her magnifying glass, she was able to use the Icons on her board to get the resources needed to pick up one of the most valuable Temple Tiles—worth eleven points. Green, however, scored almost twice that of the others for his Idols and Black top-scored for his item and artifact cards.

Lost Ruins of Arnak
– Image by boardGOATS

It was the Temple points, together with the extra points Plum got for getting to the top of the Explore/Research Track that ultimately made the difference, giving her a total of sixty-nine points, thirteen more than Green who took second place.  Both Plum and Green had played before, though most of their previous games had been online where the administration of the card shuffling was done for them, hence the Rules Malfunction.  It was Black’s first game, and despite the rules issue and not scoring as well as the other two, he still really enjoyed the game, so there is a good chance it will get another outing in the not too distant future.

Lost Ruins of Arnak
– Image by boardGOATS

Meanwhile, that left six players; Pink was keen to give his favourite panda game another outing, so Pine and Lime joined him in a game of Zoo Break.  This is a cooperative game, where players work together to try to prevent animals escaping from Bedlam Zoo.  On their turn, players roll the die to decide how many Action Points they get, then, after carrying out their turn, flip a Escape Card and a then a Move Card to determine what gets out of its cage and what moves.  Players have to avoid getting trampled on or bitten by the animals, while catching them and then locking them in their cages.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

The group started well, or at least it started well from Pink’s perspective when he was cuddled by a Panda (one of his real-life wishes).  However, the game did not go so well.  There are a number of optional variants, and the group had chosen to use the “Faulty Lock” Variant which means that if an escape card is drawn for animals who have already been locked up, the die is rolled to determine whether there are escapees.  This turned out to make things just a bit too difficult and a Coral snake quickly made a bid for freedom, and as it’s a dangerous animal, that was that.  One snake might not seem like much, but there were another five lining up in front of the gate and three tigers too, so it really did not go well.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

Reluctant to leave it like that, the trio decided to give it another try, this time without the “Faulty Lock” Variant.  This second try went better, though at one point two elephants got very close to the exit.  The situation was rescued by peanuts which enticed them to the Snack Stall where they were eventually captured.  There was some extensive rules reading to decide whether Pandas were considered “Dangerous” so only one escaping would trigger failure.  The group concluded that Pandas were not Dangerous animals after all though, and four Pandas roaming the streets would not lead to closure of the Zoo (though perhaps the Chinese government would not be appreciative).

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

In the end, the distinction wasn’t necessary, none of the Pandas got out, though one Capuchin did manage to escape.  That was all, however, and once the group finally rounded up the last of the mad Meercat escapees, the writing was on the wall and the Zoo was saved.  The other games were still underway, so once the charming wooden animals had been tucked away, the trio opted for a couple of rounds of Coloretto.  This is a charming little card game which is the core of the, arguably better known board game, Zooloretto.

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

The game is very simple:  Players either draw a Chameleon card from the deck and add it to one of the Carts, or take the cards on one of the Carts and add them to their tableau, stepping out until everyone else has taken a Cart.  Each Cart has three spaces and players core points for their three largest sets of cards and negative points for any others.  The player with the most points at the end of the round after the trigger card is revealed is the winner.  The clever part is the scoring for sets, which uses the Triangular Number sequence and means that later cards are worth a lot more than the early ones.

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

When the Golden Chameleon card came out, there was some discussion about the difference between it and the multi-coloured Chameleon.  Blue, on the next table was consulted, and explained that it meant the person who takes it gets an extra card drawn from the top of the deck.  With that sorted, the game continued.  The group played two games and both were close, especially between Pine and Pink with Pink just edging it for the first game by two points and Pine just beating Pink by a single point in the second.  Both games were won by Lime, however, and by a larger margin, taking the first by four points and the second by six.

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

The last table included three players, Blue, Purple and Byzantium.  They were the last to start, and were somewhat torn between two of the current hot games in the group, Wyrmspan and Meadow.  After some discussion, the group went for what was probably the easier of the two, and gave Meadow its their outing in three consecutive meetings.  A light to medium card collection game, it was new to both Purple and Byzantium, so Blue explained the rules.  Most of the game is built round a Card Market with players placing an Action Token and taking a card into their hand, before playing a card from their hand.

Meadow
– Image by boardGOATS

This aspect of the game has led to some reviewers comparing the game to Splendor, though there is a lot more to the game than that.  In addition to the Market, there is a second Campfire board, which allows players to carry out special actions, and also claim Bonus points. for cards in their tableau.  The first time the game was played, there was a token included erroneously from the Envelope U mini-expansion, and last time the game got an outing, there was a minor rules malfunction where the four players ended up playing on the three-player board.  So although the game has been played three times in fairly quick succession, this time was the first time the game was played by the rules as written, probably.

Meadow
– Image by boardGOATS

Players start with a hand of cards, including one from the North deck (which is only introduced halfway through the game)—this last card is typically more worth more but is difficult to play, so is a good way to get a steer in the early stages of the game.  As well as the other cards in their starting hand, another key strategy lead is the Bonus points obtained from the Campfire board.  These are obtained by placing a Bonus point token between two Icons, but in order to do so, the player must have those icons in their tableau.  Since each bonus place can only be claimed once, this element of the game is something of a race between those who want to compete for these points.

Meadow
– Image by boardGOATS

This time, the Icons drawn at random and placed round the Campfire included the relatively scarce Cottage, Fence and Garden Bird as well as the Wolf and Hawk which only come out in the second half of the game, when the North deck is introduced.  This made the Bonus points hard to claim. Although neither Blue nor Byzantium appreciated it at the time, although most Wolf cards are in the North deck, this copy of the game included the Seal promo card, which is a Wolf card that hides in the South Deck.  As it was key to getting bonus points, when it came out, both Blue and Byzantium spotted it, but Blue got to it first, and that turned out to be critical to her Bonus point objectives as Byzantium pinched the other spots early.

Meadow
– Image by boardGOATS

Meanwhile, Purple was busy collecting frogs and very effectively daisy-chaining cards to give her points.  As the game moved into its final rounds, Byzantium struggled to get a Landscape card that he could play without needing too many difficult prerequisites.  In spite of the frustrations when players can’t get cards, the game has a nice gentle roll to it and with three players doesn’t outstay its welcome in the way it does with four (when there are two extra rounds).  It was quite a tight game—Purple and Byzanium finished with thirty-seven and thirty-six points respectively from their observations, but Byzantium had more points from his Landscape cards.

Meadow
– Image by boardGOATS

Blue didn’t do as well as them with her observations, but had the most points from her Landscape cards.  Although Purple hadn’t managed to get any Bonus points, both Blue and Byzantium had picked up the full nine giving them a bit of a lead.  In the end, it was the Observations that were key, and they gave Byzantium victory by four points with a total of sixty.  As the Meadows were tidied up, the last of the other games came to a close too and everyone chatted until it was time to go home.

Meadow
– Image by boardGOATS

Learning Outcome:  Every game should come with ceramic component bowls.

5th September 2023

The evening began with Green and Purple arriving to find Plum and Cobalt sitting outside the pub chatting.  This was partly because the weather was warm, but also because someone else was sitting at our usual table and we had been relegated to another long table on the other side of the room.  Pine arrived soon after and once introductions between Cobalt and those who had not been about last time were concluded, the group decided to play a short intro game while they waited for everyone else to arrive.  The game settled on was Coloretto, which had only just begun when Ivory arrived, but he was happy to watch.

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

Coloretto is a quick and simple game that is very popular with the group.  Players either turn over the top card and add it to a “Truck”, or take a Truck and add it’s contents to their collection, sitting out until everyone else has taken a Truck.  Players are collecting coloured sets of Chameleon cards, but the key is that only three sets score positive points, with the others scoring negatively.  Thus players are trying to get as many cards in three colour suits, and as few as possible in each of the rest.  This time, everyone started with a different colour, so there were no obvious clashes.  As is usual for this game, it took a few turns for each players position to become clearer.

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

By this time Plum was keeping the number of colour sets she had low with only two, but also had a couple of +2 bonus point cards and a Rainbow Chameleon (a wild) . Purple’s set was similar but with three colours.  Green was making steady progress and Cobalt was low on any particular colour, but only had four sets and a Rainbow Chameleon, so was poised for a good score if the cards fell in his favour. Pine meanwhile seemed to be in the process of collecting at least one of each colour!  By the end of the game, Plum had managed to collect Chameleons in just three colours and so scored no negatives, while Pine just seemed to have sets of everything. Purple had three extra colours, but with only one of each; her Rainbow Chameleon and +2 cards helped to give her a good score.

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

Green managed only one negative point, but had no bonuses, while Cobalt had his cards fall right and ended with a couple of good colour sets and with it, victory.  By the conclusion of Coloretto, Jade and Sapphire had arrived bringing with them the feature game, Vaalbara.  In this game, each player is a clan leader trying to take over some territories with game-play which is vaguely reminiscent of Libertalia/Winds of Galecrest.  Players all have the same deck of twelve cards representing the members of their tribe.  Each turn, players choose secretly one card, then in the order of initiative of the revealed Characters, players activate their powers and take over one of the available Territories. Each type of Territory has its own way of scoring points (Collection, Pair, Diversity, Risk etc.).

Vaalbara
– Image by boardGOATS

Thus the game is about timing and playing the best powers and the high initiatives at the most opportune moments. After nine rounds, the player with the most points wins.  Jade and Sapphire had played Vaalbara about a dozen times together, and Green had played a similar number of games on Board Game Arena with reasonable success. Pine was entirely new to it the game and joined the other three.  Jade and Pine took the Mountains in the first round, and then Jade managed to snatch the only one on offer in the second round.  Green ended up with the final card in the first round—the All Rounder, so scored poorly with it.

Vaalbara
– Image by boardGOATS

By the middle of the game Sapphire was going all out for Fields, Jade was on to his third Mountain and Pine was beginning to get the hang of things.  Green was struggling with his all rounder strategy:  all he could get was a River and several Forests and even after he’d swapped one of those for something else (he’d mixed up the cards and instead of swapping a card between first and second row, it was any card with the top card of the deck) it didn’t work out.  Pine managed to complete his second Mountain, but Jade amazingly managed all four which catapulted his score. It was only then that Pine and Green realised that the fourth Mountain was twenty points on top of the ten for the first three (i.e. a very thirty in total from four cards).

Vaalbara
– Image by boardGOATS

By the end of the game the Poppy Fields were coming out in profusion and started to really score a lot of points.  Unfortunately for Green, Jade managed to nab the Field card ahead of him for a five type bonus and Green was still only on four terrain types.  Once the dust had settled and the final scores were compiled, it was quite close with Jade and Pine were tied for first on seventy points, and Green only three points behind and just ahead of Sapphire. Pine joked that maybe the tie-break would be the player position on the last card back, thinking that would about as arbitrary as some of the other tie breaks had been recently. A quick check of the rules confirmed it and ultimately gave victory to Jade.

Vaalbara
– Image by boardGOATS

From there, the quartet moved on to play an old favorite, Azul.  In this game, players are tile-laying artists challenged to embellish the walls of the Royal Palace of Evora.  On their turn, players draft colored tiles from the marketplace onto their player board.  At the end of the round, players score points based on how they’ve placed their tiles to decorate the palace with wasted tiles scoring negative points.  Bonuses are awarded at the end of the game for completing rows and columns and sets of the same colour, and then player with the most points is the winner.  A pretty game, the group started with a short discussion about what colour one of the tiles really was.

Azul
– Image by boardGOATS

People wanted to call it blue, but there is already a fully blue tile, and this one was a little more turquoise with a white pattern—they did not come up with answer to the problem.  The game played much as it always does with complaints about the tiles that were not coming out of the bag when needed and at one point there was one Marketplace with four tiles all the same colour (that colour that we could not quite pin a name on).  Mid-way through the game no-one seemed to want the orange tiles, and it ended up with about eight of them in the middle of the table. It finally fell to Pine to take them, but he could not place any of them and they all had to go on his negative score line!

Azul
– Image by boardGOATS

The game was reluctantly brought to a conclusion by Sapphire, at the urging of everyone else.  He did not want to complete his row, wanting to hold out and complete a different colour later, but if he hadn’t taken the tile he would have ended up with a larger negative score and it had already not been possible to fully populate market. After final scoring, Jade and Sapphire shared the lead with ninety-five points with Green, who’d had a much better game than he usually has in third.  Tie break time again, but this time Sapphire won it because he was the only player to have completed a full row (the tile he hadn’t wanted to take).

Azul
– Image by boardGOATS

There was still time for something else, and the group settled on Nimalia, a new, interesting card-laying game where players are designing the best Animal Sanctuary.  Each card has four “Biome” squares on it of potentially different terrain, and different animals.  Players start each round with three cards and draft them, placing the chosen card partly (or wholly) on top the already laid cards in a simlar way to Sprawlopolis or Honshū.  The Sanctuary must remain within a six by six grid made of the squares (not the cards).  The game is played over a series of five rounds, where two or three different conditions are scored at the end of each drafting round.  This time, the first round would score for the largest area of Savannah and for connected Polar Bears and in the second round the scoring switched to Polar Bears and Gorillas next to Water.

Nimalia
– Image by boardGOATS

In the third round it returned to the largest Savannah, but with the complication of scoring maximum for no Giraffes down to scoring nothing with three or more giraffes—of course giraffes live in the Savannah!  Rounds four and five used both the Giraffes and the Gorillas to score while adding in the Savannahs in the fourth round and polar bears in the fifth.  The nature of the scoring meant that any cards with Giraffes were quickly passed on leaving some players with a double giraffe card to lay as the last card on a giraffe scoring round.  Since it wasn’t possible to lay a new card underneath an old one, those giraffes caused scores to tumble!

Nimalia
– Image by boardGOATS

In the first round Pine roared into the lead while everyone else stayed within a point or two of each other.  After the second round, Sapphire was the one who lost out, with Pine retaining his significant advantage. During the third and fourth rounds Jade and Green managed to catch Pine, with Jade pulling into the lead.  Sapphire managed a good score in the fourth round, but he had a lot of ground to make up and he’d left his charge to the finish a little too late.  In the final scoring, Jade and Green pulled ahead in a tight battle, which Jade won by just two points with his total of eighty. Pine was third after flailing around in the final round and having been left with a double giraffe.

Nimalia
– Image by boardGOATS

While all that was on-going, the rest of the group, Plum, Ivory, Purple and Cobalt, opted for a club favourite, Wingspan, enhanced by the European Expansion.  This is a card-driven engine-building game where players choose one of four possible actions (activating their Woodland, Grassland or Wetland areas or placing a bird card in one of those locations).  Points come from each individual card end of round goals, and eggs left at the end.  The game is all about building combinations of cards that work together efficiently, so the it took all night as everyone wanted to do their absolute best.

Wingspan
– Image by boardGOATS

Ivory as always was very good at this, but was also quite generous giving everyone food each time he activated his Woodland area.  Cobalt was the first to get three bird cards in his Reserve, though Ivory  ended up with the most valuable birds on his board, with Plum’s next highest.  One of Plums birds moved at the end of each round though, which was very useful for saving costs and improving yields.  It was Ivory and Cobalt who tended to come out best with the end of round goals.  As is often the case Ivory continued to score well with a good haul of bonus card points too.

Wingspan: European Expansion
– Image by boardGOATS

Purple failed to complete any of her bonus cards, but did make sure all her birds laid purple eggs.  Cobalt finished the game with the most eggs, however, inevitably followed by Ivory.  As for cached food and cards, Plum got the most food, but Purple had the most Tucked cards.  With all the scores added up, Ivory was the almost inevitable winner on ninety-three with Cobalt not far behind with eighty-three and Plum taking the battle for third by just three points in what was a hard-fought game.

Wingspan
– Image by boardGOATS

Learning outcome:  Goats love playing with colours.

8th August 2023

Blue and Pink were first to arrive, and, as they finished their pizza, others began to turn up too.  It was a slow start on a relatively quiet night, but eventually Blue Ivory, Black and Jade were settling down to play the “Feature Game“, Ginkopolis.  This is a medium weight tile-laying game with an area control element.  Blue explained that it was one of those games that had been through a phase of being very out of print and therefore inevitably in high demand, though now was much more available.  The game is set in 2212 where players are urban planners trying to building the eco-city, Ginkgopolis, though the theme is quite loose and in reality, it is much more more abstract that that.

Ginkgopolis
– Image by boardGOATS

The game is card-driven, with players simultaneously choosing a card and any tiles they are going to play with it, and then, starting with the first player, taking it in turns to carry out one of three possible actions: Urbanise, Construct or Exploit.  There are two different sorts of cards in the game, Urbanisation cards which feature a letter, and Construction cards which come in three different colour suits, red, blue and orange, and are numbered one to twenty. When choosing either an Urbanise action or a Construct action, players additionally choose a Tile to play from their personal stash.  Urbanising involves placing a tile in the space matching the letter on their Urbanise card, adding a wooden Resource block in their colour to claim it.

Ginkgopolis
– Image by boardGOATS

There is a little upkeep, in that they move the Urbanisation letter marker to a space orthogonally adjacent to the Tile they placed and mark it with a grey cylinder.  As a reward for urbanising, players get to Activate all orthogonally adjacent buildings.  This is claiming a number of  Tiles, Resources or Ginkgo Points (a sort of currency used in the game), with the item dependent on the colour and the number received equal to the height of the Building activated.  Constructing is similar, except the Tile chosen is placed on top of another Tile, returning any Resources on the tile to their owner and claiming Ginkgo Points from the bank for each one.

Ginkgopolis
– Image by boardGOATS

In addition to this immediate reward, there are also costs:  if the Constructed Tile has a lower number than the tile it is built on, they must pay the difference in Ginkgo Points and if the colour is different, they must also pay one Resource to the general supply.  In addition to these potential costs, the active player must also place Resources from their stash on top of the newly expanded building to claim it (with the number equal to the height).  This can make Constructing expensive, though as the game progresses, they get Resources back as other players build on buildings they have Urbanised or Constructed.  Still, particularly early in the game, players can find themselves running out of supplies, in which case, they can Exploit.

Ginkgopolis
– Image by boardGOATS

Exploiting involves playing cards (without a tile) to gain Tiles, Resources, or Ginkgo Points.  How they Exploit depends on whether the card they are Exploiting is an Urbanisation card or a Construction card.  For Urbanisation cards, players just take either a Resource or a Tile from the supply, whereas for Construction cards, players Activate the building on the card to receive Tiles, Resources or Ginkgo Points equal to the height of the building. This is not the only way to get resources, however.  Once a player has carried out their chosen action, they either recycle the card (if they Urbanised or Exploited) or, if they Constructed, they keep it in front of them.  Each Construction card has an action as well as a number and a colour, and these are activated during the game, most after carrying out actions, with some providing end-game Points.

Ginkgopolis
– Image by boardGOATS

And scoring is where the game gets tricky.  The winner is the player with the most Ginkgo Points at the end of the game, but in addition to chips acquired during the game and end-game points from Construction cards, the majority of the points come from the area control element of the game.  The city is divided into districts with districts defined as areas containing at least two buildings of the same colour.  The player with the most Resources in the district wins control and takes Ginkgo Points equal to the total number of Resources in the district.  The player to take second gets Ginkgo Points equal to the number of their Resources in the district.  Ties are broken in favour of the player with the highest building.

Ginkgopolis
– Image by boardGOATS

There is quite a lot of critical upkeep in the game, but the most important it to remember to put a grey construction cylinder on buildings during Urbanisation and Construction.  This is because at the end of each turn, players top their hand back up to four cards drawn at random—when the draw deck is empty, however, the discard deck is recycled and topped up with cards that correspond to the newly constructed buildings.  Since cards that correspond to buildings are kept when the building is over-built, and everything else is recycled, the draw deck (and the cards in hand) comprise all the buildings currently visible, together with all the Urbanisation cards, and nothing else.

Ginkgopolis
– Image by boardGOATS

Getting this wrong, breaks the game spectacularly, as Blue and Ivory had found out on the one other occasion they played it (with Pink, during one of the sporadic meetings in the pub late in the Summer of 2020).  This time, they were aware of the importance of placing the grey markers and mostly managed to stay on top of that so everything went a bit smoother, allowing players to concentrate on the nuances of the game.  And there are lots of nuances.  For example, over-building can help a player to take control of a district, or, if they change its colour, break one up, but it also gives Resources to the previous owner.  Similarly, Urbanising expands the city, but provides a cheap way for other players to expand districts and perhaps muscle in.

Ginkgopolis
– Image by boardGOATS

The game started with everyone feeling their way, trying to make the most of the Character cards they were dealt at the start of the game.  These give bonuses to players to get them going in the early stages of the game.  It is possible to draft these character cards, but the group began with the preconstructed sets:  Ivory got set one, Black got set six, Jade got set two and Blue got set five.  These give players a strategy steer in the early part of the game, for example, Blue and Black’s cards gave them two bonuses for Exploiting while Jade and Ivory both benefited twice for Constructing.  Quite early in the game, it became clear that there was one building towards the middle that was going to be quite critical in the area control battle and Blue, Black and then Ivory all over-built and tried to claim it for their own.

Ginkgopolis
– Image by boardGOATS

The game has the ability to feel very swingy, and lacking in control, and yet it is actually an extremely smart, tactical game—one clever tile placement can completely change the game by breaking up a district or joining two districts together and totally change the balance of power.  This game was no different in that regard, though it took a little time for everyone to really start to see its potential.  There were other elements of the game that players gradually came to appreciate.  For example, Black ran into the unexpected difficulty of running out of Resource markers, because he had a lot in the city.  This gave the others a problem—building over his buildings relieved that pressure, but because he had so many on the board, it was hard to avoid doing it.

Ginkgopolis
– Image by boardGOATS

Jade also had difficulties getting the tiles he wanted to match his cards, while Ivory had difficulties getting the cards he wanted (and was the only one to spend one of his refresh hand tokens, which cost him two points in the end-game scoring).  The game ebbed and flowed, and although it vastly exceeded its advertised forty-five minutes, it wasn’t long before the stack of tiles dwindled and triggered the end of the game.  At this point, players could choose whether to add tiles from their hand back into the game.  Jade was aghast at the idea having struggled to get tiles throughout, but Ivory had an enormous stack and put a few back into the supply to keep things going for another couple of rounds.

Ginkgopolis
– Image by boardGOATS

As the game drew to a close, the question was whether anyone would be able to make a move on the largest districts.  The highest building that had been long fought over now belonged to Ivory, but had been cut off, leaving it pointless, which left two large red and one large blue district as well as some smaller efforts.  Key was the number of Ginkgo points picked up during the game—everyone thought Ivory had a lot, but it turned out Black was the king of the Ginkgo tokens with a massive thirty-six. Blue was a little way behind him, but made up for this with her city scoring, which ultimately gave her victory with sixty-six points, nine more than Black in second who was well clear of Jade and Ivory who tied for third.

Ginkgopolis
– Image by boardGOATS

Meanwhile, on the next table, Purple, Green and Pink were deciding what to play while they waited for Pine who was running late.  Green commented that he didn’t want to play something new, so in the end the group settled on Splendor.  This is an old favourite, though one with poignant memories for most in the group as it was a favourite of Burgundy who sadly passed away eighteen months ago—it would have been his sixty-fifth birthday at the end of the month.  As always, with Burgundy in mind, the trio set the game up.  It is a very simple, tactical engine builder, where players take it in turns to either take chips from the supply, use chips to buy a face up card from the market or, occasionally, reserve a card.

Splendor
– Image by boardGOATS

Players win points for the higher value cards, or for collecting enough cards of specified colours to claim a Noble.  This time, Pink tried a strategy that concentrated on going for cheap cards with the primary aim of scoring for Nobles.  This had the benefit of giving him lots of cards which builds the engine quickly making other cards cheaper.  The strategy worked well, but not as well as Pink needed it to for him to beat Green who ended the game, with a lead of three points.  As Splendor came to a close, Pine rocked up, so the newly expanded, now quartet looked for something fairly light to play, and Pink suggested one of his favourites, For Sale.

For Sale
– Image by boardGOATS

As Pink described it, like football, For Sale is a game of two halves.  In the first half, players bid for properties which they then sell in the second half of the game.  This time, Purple became a bit of a tent specialist (with tents of various quality), which turned out not to work so well for her.  Pine ended up with the outside netty (one of the lowest value cards), but one that you are almost guaranteed not to loose money on.  Once again, however, the winner was Green with Pink taking his second second place.  So the question was, could anything upset that pattern?

For Sale
– Image by boardGOATS

The group moved on to Botswana, a sort of set collection stock-holding card game that it is really hard to get your head round despite actually being very simple.  The five animal suites each have six cards, which are shuffled together and dealt out.  Players then play a card from their hand, and take any one of the animals on the table.  The round is over when any one of the five animals has the sixth card played, at which point players score points for each animal they have, equal to the final card played.  After three rounds, the player with the most points is the winner.

Botswana
– Image by boardGOATS

This time, all three rounds were remarkably even.  Purple was just one point behind green going into the final round, though Pink had some ground to make up if he was going to continue his run of second places.  In the end, Green made it three from three, and relatively poor final rounds from both Pink and Purple left Pine to take second with Purple just behind.  Green decided three was enough, and didn’t fancy tarnishing his winning streak, so headed off while Purple and Pink waited for their other halves to finish Ginkopolis, and looked round for a suitable filler.

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

Coloretto is another old favourite, and one that plays really well with three.  A really simple set collecting game, on their turn, players either turn over a coloured chameleon card and place it on a truck, or take a truck.  At the end of the game (when the draw deck has been mostly depleted), players score points for each coloured set of cards.  In general, the larger sets score more, but only the largest three score positively, everything else gives negative scores.  For a bit of variety, the group used the scoring card from the Limit Cards/Extra Cards mini expansion (but without any of the other rules and cards).  This gives low scores for the small groups, but very high scores for the large sets.

Coloretto: The Extra Cards
– Image by
boardGOATS

Aside from a query about the Golden Joker (which like the normal multi-coloured Joker can be added to any set at the end of the game, but additionally gives an extra card drawn at random from the deck), there was no real need to revise the rules.  It was a good game, though Pink blotted his copy book with quite a lot of negative points and wasn’t able to improve on his two second places as a result.  The run-away winner was Purple though, who finished with forty-eight points, eight more than Pine in second place.  And with Ginkopolis coming to an end too, that was it for another week.

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

Learning Outcome:  In some games, you have to start building right from the gink-go…

16th May 2023

Unusually, Blue and Pink were joined early by Lime for pizza, and Pine who wasn’t eating.  So, while they were waiting for food to arrive the group squeezed in a very quick game of Coloretto. This is a popular game within the group, but somehow Lime had missed out on it.  It is quite simple to play, but one of those games that takes a couple of tries to get the hang of playing well, or as in Blue’s case, lots of tries and still not play it well.  The idea is simple enough though:  players take it in turns to either take a coloured chameleon card from the deck and add it to one of the “trucks”, or take one of the trucks and add the cards on it to their display.

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

Players score points according to the triangular number series where every additional card is worth one more additional point than the previous card.  Thus, the fourth card someone gets is worth ten points, four more points than the third card (which itself is worth three more than the second and so on).  Collecting chameleons was briefly interrupted by the arrival of Hoi-sin duck pizzas, but that didn’t stop Pink winning with a total of thirty-seven points,  well ahead of a tie for second place between Blue and Pine.  By this time, Purple, Black and Teal had arrived and it was time to decide who was going to play what.

Coloretto
– Image by boardGOATS

Pink and Lime were very keen to give Zoo Break another go, having left the town of Bedlam over-run with escaped animals last time the group played.  With it being such a quiet night, there was some debate as to what the other group were going to play, but in the end they opted for the “Feature Game“, the Marina expansion to one of our most popular little games, Draftosaurus.  Pine was keen to play with the cute wooden zoo meeples and after the mayhem last time, Blue was also keen not to miss out, which left Purple, Black and Teal to play with dinosaurs.  The only problem was, none of them knew how to play it, so while Lime, Pink and Pine set up Bedlam Zoo, Blue quickly explained the rules to Draftosaurus.

Draftosaurus
– Image by boardGOATS

Draftosaurus is a very simple drafting game in the vein of Sushi Go! or 7 Wonders, but instead of drafting cards, players are drafting wooden dino-meeples.  The idea is that players start with a handful of dino-meeples and choose one to keep and pass the rest on to the next player.  The active player rolls a location die which adds restrictions on which pens players can place their chosen dinosaur in in their dino-park.  When everyone has placed their first dino, the die is passed to the next player and everyone chooses their next meeple from the pile passed to them by their neighbour.  The round is complete when each player has placed six meeples, and the game is played over two rounds (passing dino-meeples in opposite directions in each round).

Draftosaurus
– Image by boardGOATS

The Marina expansion adds brown Plesiosaurs to the yellow Triceratops, blue Stegosaurus, pink Brachiosaurus, orange Spinosaurus, green Parasaurolophus, and red Tyrannosaurus rex from the base game.  Where dinosaurs from the base game can always be placed in the river that runs through the middle of each player’s park (where they only earn a single point), Plesiosaurs all go into the river, which they travel along into an expansion board.  Each expansion board is slightly different, but when a player places the non-Plesiosaur dinosaur shown on the bridge, if they have a dinosaur immediately up-stream of the bridge, it can pass under it into the next section of the river where it will score more points.

Draftosaurus
– Image by boardGOATS

It was a close game with everyone following different tactics.  Teal concentrated on trying to fill his Meadow of Differences while Black focused on collecting pink Brachiosaurs and Purple stuffed her Forest of Sameness with blue Stegosaurs.  Black took one Plesiosaur, Purple collected two and Teal three, though only one of his made it under the first bridge and out of the main river.  Purple managed to minimise the number of non-scoring dino-meeples in her park, and that just gave her the edge, and she finished a couple of points ahead of Teal who took second place.

Draftosaurus: Marina
– Image by boardGOATS

Although Teal, Purple and Black tried to persuade her to stay (and there was even some suggestion of her playing both games simultaneously), once she had explained the rules, Blue joined the madness in Bedlam, playing Zoo Break.  In this game, players are keepers trying to prevent their charges escaping from the zoo, and to win the game, they have to return all escaped critters to their enclosures and lock the doors.  Losing is much easier—if five cuddly creatures or one dangerous one escape from the zoo, then it is all over.  Last time, only one animal escaped, but it was a cobra, so that was that.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

On their turn, players first roll the action die to find out how many Action Points the player has to work with for that round.  Then, after they have carried out their actions, one card from the Escape deck and then one card from the Move deck are revealed.  The Escape card liberates one or more animals, while the Move card often moves animals towards the exit, but occasionally causes other things to happen, like waking up sleeping tigers, breaking barricades and generally cause more chaos.  After last time, the group decided to start by digging through the Supply deck and make sure everyone went really well equipped, then, prioritise capturing (or at least controlling) the Meerkats, as they had been so problematic last time.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

On that occasion, the group had played with two “Phew” Cards in the Escape deck, and (following a rules malfunction) all the blank cards in in the Move deck.  In spite of all the blank cards, they still lost spectacularly.  So, this time, the group stuck with the two “Phew” Cards, but removed the blanks from the Move deck and did not add any other rules variants as they really wanted to win, though they stuck with the thematically logical variant where tigers remain tranquilised when returned to their pen. Lime had the Black Belt special power which meant he couldn’t be hurt by animals, so he got the job of dealing with snakes which hide so players have to reveal them, with the risk of being attacked if they are dangerous.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

Pink, as usual wanted to work with the pandas, but the Capuchin monkeys were a more immediate threat, and the group made a point of dealing with the troublesome meerkats early this time, so then he went on to deal with them once the monkeys were locked up.  Blue, who had the panda enclosure key, took over trying to control them, but they kept escaping just as Blue was about to lock their cage. Blue was encouraged to capture one panda who was in the rhino’s path, but that meant she was left standing there—”You’ll be fine”, said Pink.  And Blue was immediately flattened by a charging rhino and had to spend a turn with the medic removing the hoof-prints from her forehead.  One meerkat escaped from the zoo, but was left to run free so Keepers could focus elsewhere and then lock their enclosure.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

With two enclosures locked early, things became slightly more manageable.  The group wimped out of using the faulty lock variant however, because nobody wanted to risk failing a second time, and certainly, including it would have made things much more difficult.  As it was, one tiger got within sniffing distance of freedom, but was tranked before he could take that one final bound.  Pine made excellent use of his running skills (as Track Star he could move twice as fast as anyone else) and bravely helped Lime with snakes and wielded his dart gun—before long, the zoo was littered with big sleeping cats.  That was all very well, until they woke up at which point Pine had to do the job all over again.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

After her run-in with the rhino, Blue tried to end her turn on hedge spaces, but that meant she was unable to swap supplies with other players as she couldn’t share her space.  Once the Pandas were vaguely under control, Blue was able to get a stretcher and another dart gun and help Pine with the tigers, making use of her Gardener ability, hiding in bushes and taking a pop at the big kitties from a place of safety.  While Pine and Blue were working on the tigers, the elephants started rampaging.  As the nearest and armed with a leash, Lime took a break from snakes and tried prevent them from causing too much damage.  This was all very well until (much to Pink’s disgust as he would have loved a black and white cuddle), Lime rolled the lowest number and got hugged by a panda leaving him unable to do anything until it was prised off him.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

In the dying rounds, Pink’s, and indeed everyone else’s delight was evident, when another panda popped up for a cuddle and everyone cheered when Pink was the one to roll the lowest number and get a hug.  As the Lucky Duck, on his turn he was able to roll the Action Die multiple times to get more points, but he checked the rules to see if he was obliged to spend his first three points to escape from the furry cuddle or whether he could just stay there for the rest of the game.  In the end, he sent it back to its enclosure, but it probably wouldn’t have mattered.  With one last push, Pine and Lime rounded up the last of the snakes, then the group finally sorted out the charging elephants and mischievous pandas, and finally locked up the rhino, giving the group a much deserved victory.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

Draftosaurus is a much quicker game than Zoo Break, so while they Keepers were dealing with the tigers, elephants and disobedient pandas, Teal, Black and Purple moved onto play Splendor.  This was one of Burgundy’s favourite games and he was almost unbeatable at it, so we never play it without thinking of him.  It is a very simple engine builder card game, but takes great skill to repeatedly win in the way Burgundy did.  The idea is that on their turn, players either collect gem tokens (three different colours, or two the same as long as there are at least four left), or spend tokens to buy cards from the market.  Cards act as permanent gem tokens (effectively reducing the cost of cards later in the game), but also provide Victory Points—when a player passes fifteen points, that triggers the end of the game.

Splendor
– Image by boardGOATS

In addition to the two basic actions, there is also the relatively rarely used action of reserving cards, where a player gets a wild, gold token and can reserve one card which they can pay for later.  This time, both Teal and Purple reserved cards, while Black prioritised taking high value cards.  Reserving cards can be a very effective tactic, but the game is all about the cards available in the market and surfing through them as quickly and efficiently as possible and amassing points.  As it was, Black romped away with victory, his fifteen points three times that of anyone else.  And with that, both Splendor and Zoo Break finished, leaving the group with a little time to play something else.  Teal and Lime headed off, so after some discussion, Pine, Black, Purple, Pink and Blue decided to give Draftosaurus with the Marina expansion another go as it was the “Feature Game“.

Draftosaurus
– Image by boardGOATS

It was then that the group realised the errors in the original explanation, in particular how the Solitary Isle enclosure worked.  Pine corrected Blue’s errors and the second game began.  Pine and Blue both tried to exploit the Plesiosaurs at every opportunity, and Pink tried to claim extra points for reverse parking his solitary Plesiosaur into the dock.  It turned out he didn’t need them though, as with forty-seven points he took his third win of the night.  Blue and Black tied for second place, while Purple unfortunately had to recount when she realised she had a pink Brachiosaur elsewhere in her park so couldn’t score seven points for her solitary Isle.  That left a bit of time for a chat, but everyone was tired and it wasn’t long before the last of the group headed home.

Draftosaurus: Marina
– Image by boardGOATS

Learning Outcome:  Who needs TV when you’ve got T.Rex?

2nd May 2023

Blue and Pink were the first to arrive and were just finishing their supper when Magenta walked in—sadly not to join in the games as she was there for a Scout meeting.  After a quick chat, she left and as Blue recapped the rules for the “Feature Game“, Zoo Break, Teal arrived and then Purple and Black.  The group had just decided to play Alles im Eimer (aka The Bucket King), when Ivory rocked up to make the full compliment of six.  Purple explained the rules with help from Black.  The idea is very simple:  each player builds a pyramid of ten bucket tokens with two of each of five colours.

Alles im Eimer
– Image by boardGOATS

One player starts, playing a coloured, numbered, animal card and each player has to follow with the same colour and a higher number before picking up a card.  Players can play multiple cards to make the total, but they only ever receive a single replacement card.  If they can’t, or choose not to follow, they lose a bucket of that colour, and any buckets above it.  Worse, if they split their pile of buckets in two, they lose one part as players can only ever have one pile.  On the plus-side, if a player can’t play (or chooses not to), they then lead with a free choice of colour and number.  The last player with buckets still standing is the winner.  With Purple shuffling, Ivory was the first to play.

Alles im Eimer
– Image by boardGOATS

It turns out that there are two things that are really critical in this game.  Firstly, how players stack their buckets—it is not as simple as playing to their hand strengths; the smart player also spreads the colours out a bit so they aren’t forced to take buckets from low down when the unexpected happens.  Secondly, as Ivory pointed out, like 6 Nimmt!, it is all about timing, which is something players may not have control of.  A few rounds in, Black spotted that Pink to his left still had a complete stack where bucket piles had been falling all over the place everywhere else.  So, Black made it his business to make Pink’s life difficult.  From there, it was gloves off and the buckets really started to tumble.  Purple was the first player to kick the last of her buckets over which left Blue to do what she could to damage Ivory’s largely unscathed pile.

Alles im Eimer
– Image by boardGOATS

Black, then Blue, then Teal, all fell, leaving just Pink and Ivory to fight it out.  With Pink’s dwindling pile, it always looked an uphill task, and so it proved, with Ivory taking victory with five buckets still standing.  By this time though, Lime and Green had arrived and with eight, the group split into two tables of four, the first for the “Feature Game“, Zoo Break.  Pink was nearly lured away at the suggestion that the alternate might be Takenoko, but despite being very torn by his love of pandas, he stuck with his original panda driven choice and was joined by Blue, Lime and Black as Keepers at Bedlam Zoo.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

Zoo Break is an apparently light cooperative game where players are a team of zoo-keepers trying to prevent a mass break-out.  The mechanism is quite simple:  the active player rolls a die to decide how many Action Points they get, then they carry out actions, before drawing an Escape card and a Move card (to see what animals escape and move).  The game ends when either a dangerous animal (tiger, elephant, or dangerous snake) escapes, or when the fifth cute animal (panda, Capuchin monkey, meerkat or harmless snake) exits the zoo, or when there are no animals roaming about and all the cages are locked up.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

Although the mechanism of Zoo Break is very straight-forward and the art-work implies it is a simple kiddies game, nothing could be further from the truth.  The rule book is twenty pages long, and there are a lot of details regarding escaping and recapturing animals.  For example, when an animal escapes, it doesn’t just move to the space immediately outside its Enclosure, it moves to the nearest “open” space.  Also, different animals are recaptured using different tools which have to be acquired from the supply by the Keepers.  For example, a Net can be used to capture meerkats or monkeys, while a Leash is required for pandas and elephants, and tigers need to be Tranquilised and Stretchered home (very carefully, obviously).

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

Each Keeper has a different skill.  This time, Blue had the ability to reveal snakes and capture animals from adjacent spaces (especially useful for dealing with snakes); Pink could run faster than anyone else, moving two spaces for each action point (instead of the usual one); Black, the Gardener, could move through and hide in bushes, and Lime could re-roll the die twice to try to get additional actions.  From experience with games like Forbidden Island and Forbidden Desert, the key is almost always to make good use of these special powers.  So Blue suggested she made it her business to concentrate on dealing with the snakes since she could do so without being bitten.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

Pink with his Panda obsession, was always going to go after them, and everyone else was happy to let him get on with it.  Before any of that could happen though, the Keepers needed Supplies.  Pink started, and went straight to the Supply shed and started revealing tools.  These are drawn from a face down pile, but Keepers only have space to carry four tools in their backpack, so can choose only to take the ones they want.  This was probably the team’s first mistake:  instead of the few players just searching the whole Supply pile and making a discerning choice while taking as much as they could carry, players grabbed a couple of items and headed off.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

This became a problem later in the game when the Keepers realised they didn’t have tools and were now on the other side of the board.  Black who had drawn the meerkat enclosure key headed off to the far corner to lock it quickly.  Lime captured the only roaming meerkat (which had been playing in the fountain) and Black was just about to lock the cage when another one escaped.  As he didn’t have a Net, despite being in the same space as it, he was left chasing about trying to grab it unsuccessfully.  And then more meerkats got out.  So Lime, Keeper without portfolio (but with both a Net and a Leash), waged war on the disobedient meerkats, while occasionally taking time out to catch an elephant or a monkey.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

Pink, meanwhile, had his panda enclosure Key and a Leash and was trying to do something about them, but was inconvenienced by a pair of elephants, one of which knocked him flying necessitating a visit to the Medic.  Lime captured the last of the Capuchin monkeys and Blue who was close at hand with the enclosure Key managed to slam the door shut before any more got out—just as well, as the snakes were beginning to get out of hand, and as for the meerkats, well, these little blighters were causing mayhem.  Twice the Keepers had them under control before more escaped, and as they formed a long queue, the queue kept getting longer and longer as they marched inexorably towards the exit.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

Pink used the Barricade to delay the escape of a couple of pandas and the pair marauding elephants, but it failed to hold when the Broken Barricade Move card appeared.  The rhino’s occasional charges weren’t much of an issue as they were very predictable, but once animals started to get close to the exit the rhino became more of a problem as players stayed out of its path wasting Action Points.  By this time, the tigers were becoming a problem, but Pink and Black put their Tranquiliser darts to good effect and soon the zoo was littered with sleeping tigers.  Lime had a Stretcher, but never actually used it, briefly loaning it to Blue for the only tiger returned to its enclosure (and left to peacefully sleep off the after-effects, as per one of the new variants).

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

There was a bit of a debate over whether it was more important to work on the rogue pandas or let them and meerkats escape and focus on the dangerous animals (in particular tigers and elephants).  Slowly but surely, however, the animals were taking over as there was a little procession of Keepers at the Medic’s tent, with only Lime avoiding injury.  Black was the only player to make use of the Train, because it didn’t really go where people wanted it to and players dealt with the issues nearest to them.  That was probably a good strategy; like it says in the advice, it is also important to lock stuff up early—the team didn’t.  They dealt with the monkeys, but the only other enclosure they managed to lock was the pandas, just before two meerkats and a cobra made a run for it in a single turn.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

Although the mass escape had caused the zoo to be closed down and Pink hadn’t actually been cuddled by a panda, everyone had really enjoyed themselves.  On reflection, working in pairs might have worked better (as with Flash Point and Escape), because then the team can do things much quicker, get on top of things and lock cages making life easier all round.  Black was curious about the variants available.  The group had played on “Standard” difficulty with two “Phew!” Escape cards (where nothing gets out), but thanks to a rules malfunction, had also included the blank cards in the Move deck which provided quite a bit of respite, so everyone had a good laugh at the idea of making the game harder.

Zoo Break
– Image by boardGOATS

Despite the fact the group rarely plays cooperative games, everyone was keen to give Zoo Break another outing soon.  Zoos were popular elsewhere too—the next table had been playing New York Zoo.  This is a tile-laying game that got its first Tuesday outing only a few of weeks ago, but had been enjoyed by all.  In this game, players add pens to their zoo, populating them with animals, and building attractions.  Like Uwe Rosenberg‘s other similar games (including Cottage Garden, Spring Meadow, Indian Summer and Patchwork), it is Tetris-like but what makes this one unique and interesting is the Market.

New York Zoo
– Image by boardGOATS

Players move the Marker Elephant one to four spaces round the Market, landing either on an Enclosure tile space (taking the top one and adding it to their zoo) or on an animal space (taking one or both of the animals depicted). Enclosure tiles can be placed anywhere in the player’s Zoo, then one or two identical Animals from elsewhere in their Zoo must be moved to occupy the Enclosure.  Each Enclosure can only hold one type of Animal.  When there are two or more Animals in an Enclosure together they breed when the Elephant passes the Market’s breeding spaces.

New York Zoo
– Image by boardGOATS

When an Enclosure is full, all the animals are removed and the player takes an Attraction tile of their choice and adds it to their Zoo.  Attraction tiles are useful because they fill additional spaces, and at its heart, New York Zoo is a race game—the winner is the first to fill all the spaces in their Zoo.  Purple had played last time, and Green had played elsewhere, however, Ivory and Teal were new to the game and the rules needed explanation.  That didn’t take long though, and the Elephant was soon touring the market and everyone was building their zoo and adding animals.

New York Zoo
– Image by boardGOATS

Purple was quick to get going, as was Green.  New York Zoo is really a tactical game, but there are a couple of broad strategies—fill the zoo with large Enclosures that are harder to fill, but occupy more space, or fill it with smaller Enclosures which are easier to fill with animals giving bonus Attraction tiles.  Purple went for the latter approach, getting some of the large attractions early in the game.  Teal however, opted for the former strategy, which is harder to get to work, but can be extremely effective, as indeed it was this time, making him the first to finish his zoo, and with no Attractions at all.  Purple was the best of the rest with for spaces left to fill, with Green a little way behind.

New York Zoo
– Image by boardGOATS

The Keepers in Bedlam Zoo on the next table were still trying to get the marauding beasts back in their pens (largely unsuccessfully) so the others had to decide what to play.  Green decided to go home, and couldn’t be persuaded to stay by the opportunity to play Nidavellir despite having been very keen to play it previously.  That left Purple, Ivory and Teal, who decided to play it anyhow.  Nidavellir is a card set-collection and bidding game inspired by Norse myths. The game was created by French designer Serge Laget (who sadly passed away in January this year after a lifetime of producing some great games) and the striking black and white artwork by Jean-Marie Minguez which nicely contrasts with the coloured cardboard components.

Nidavellir
– Image by boardGOATS

The story behind the game is that the kingdom of Nidavellir is under threat from the stirrings of the Dragon Fafnir and players are tasked by the King to recruit the best army to defeat it. Appropriately for our venue, the action takes places in three Dwarvish pubs where the players must use their coins to bid for the most skillful Dwarves (in a concealed auction), recruit the most prestigious Heroes, and build the best Battalion they can to defeat the Dragon.  Players hire five different professions of Dwarves into their growing army – Warriors, Hunters, Miners, Blacksmiths and Explorers.  Each player starts with five coins with the values: zero, two, three, four and five. Players place one of their coins against each pub space on their player mat.  The coins are revealed and cards are taken from each pub starting with the highest bidder.

Nidavellir
– Image by boardGOATS

Ties are broken in favour of the player with the the highest jewel token (randomised at the start) and then these players swap jewels so the losing player has an advantage next time there is a draw. Once the three pubs have been resolved, players take back their coins, and place their cards in their tableaux.  At the game end, points are awarded in different ways for each group of Dwarves.  For example, Hunters provide points based on the number of cards squared, Blacksmiths score according to the triangular sequence (as used in Coloretto), while the Navigators are simply a total of the number of points printed on the card, and so on.  Each round of the game, random face-up dwarf cards are lined up by each pub (equal to the number of players) and players bid for their order of selection.

Nidavellir
– Image by boardGOATS

If a player plays their “zero” coin, the values of the two unused coins are added together, the highest of the pair is discarded and a new coin of the same total is added to their stash from the Royal Treasure. Thus, players can gradually increase the value of their coins, which is useful for out-bidding others, but also adds value as the total coin hoard is added to their final score.  Hero cards, which supply additional points bonuses in a variety of ways are awarded when a player manages to have five cards of different type and then each time a new set of five is achieved. Heroes are selected from, a separate deck which allows for further point scoring combinations.  The start was a little slow as Purple and Ivory were both new to the game and had to figure out what to do.

Nidavellir
– Image by boardGOATS

Teal and Ivory both started by upgrading their coins.  Ivory was the first to get a set of five cards and claimed one of the Dwerg Brothers as his Hero giving him the target of collecting the other brothers which greatly crank up the points the more that are collected.  Teal, who had played the game before, chose more complex Heroes.  Half way through the game, Purple took the King’s Hand and the King’s Great Armourer Heroes for having the most Warrior and Blacksmith cards, while Teal took the Hunting Master and Crown Jeweler (for the most Hunters and Miners respectively), leaving Ivory just the Pioneer of the Kingdom (for the most Explorers).

Nidavellir
– Image by boardGOATS

The second age (played with a new deck of cards), was similar to the first, with particular tight battles around getting cards to complete sets.  Ivory had a slight advantage in this, having upgraded his coins more aggressively early in the game, and used this to get more of the Dwerg Brothers.  In contrast, Purple and Teal focused on collecting Dwarves of one kind with Teal using his Heroes to add to their “count” in particular colours when completing a set.  In the end, Purple and Teal scored best for Blacksmiths and Hunters, while Teal also took lots of points for his Miners—something he had focused on from the start.

Nidavellir
– Image by boardGOATS

Ivory however, had more Warriors and having the majority of them meant he could add the value of his most valuable coin to his score.  Despite that and over a hundred points for his Dwergs, Ivory finished just shy of Teal’s winning total of two-hundred and seventy-seven.  The downside of his victory—the winner has to face the Dragon Fafnir!  All agreed it was a good game, not overly complex, but with lots of decisions to make; a game that didn’t out stay its welcome finishing within the forty-five minutes advertised (even with two first-time players).

Nidavellir
– Image by boardGOATS

Learning outcome: Always keep a close eye on your meerkats.